By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Could MK8, Bayo2 and X run on a PS3[60]

 

could they?

yes 280 32.52%
 
no 341 39.61%
 
maybe one of them could 124 14.40%
 
maybe two of them could 41 4.76%
 
see results 75 8.71%
 
Total:861
Zero999 on 23 June 2013
outlawauron said:
Zero999 said:

the game is from ps360 so an unoptimized version will obviously look on par. but that's still a game made after 6-7 years of ps360 and wii u handled it with it's hands tied.

You and curl both ignored the second part of my post. Wii U is more powerful, but developers haven't been able to show it yet. It's really no different than Wii vs last gen graphics post. It took a while for the system to show that there was a gap between it and last generation consoles.

There are no similarities AT ALL. wii was an overclocked gamecube with a little more RAM, period.

Wii U not only is a good jump in raw power, it also have acess to modern features such as DX11, something wii could only dream of.



Around the Network
Zero999 on 23 June 2013
curl-6 said:
DevilRising said:
Mr Puggsly said:
 

My PS3 isn't responding.

Not that I'm certain what PS3's full potential is. Even its best looking games are at par with 360 games. In presentation, frame rate, and resolution.


That was the point. PS3 was significantly more powerful hardware than 360, but I'm not sure that even any Sony development teams ever really fully tapped that potential. Like you say, on par with 360 games, in most cases because with third party titles, they developed with the 360 in mind, not the PS3.

So certainly, Wii U is more powerful hardware than PS3. But you're not going to see that in especially first wave ports of PS360 titles. You might see it more noticible in a game like Watch Dogs, which they've indicated is taking advantage of the extra power.

Do you have a source for this?

Ubisoft confirmed watch dogs is being developed with high end PC's and then being downported to each platform. since it's not an up port of ps360, wii u's version will show difference.



Zero999 on 23 June 2013
ninjablade said:
think-man said:
I've seen games on the Ps3 that look better then them. So yes.

X's is the only one that I would say would be testy but I still think it'll be fine.


this always happens with new consoles, the reality is the wiiu has no games that has shown a noticable  upgrade over current gen, X for example, we have no idea how it runs, and we haven't seen have real gameplay demonstration, just snippets of gameplay, nothing you can really judge from, no direct feed captures, no real real gameplay demonstarion video, just a teasers just shows snippets of gameplay, lots of games on 360/ps3 could have been graphic kings of current gen if they had proper AA, good frame rate, pop in and not be sub hd.

so what? they didn't . it's the same as saying ps2 games could be graphical kings if they had high polygon, textures, HD ...



curl-6 on 23 June 2013
Player1x3 said:
curl-6 said:

oni-link said:

DKC:TF

That's Donkey Kong Country Returns on Wii, running in HD on the Dolphn emulator. ;)

If we're going to compare games by year:

PS3 launch COD:

Wii U launch COD:


Thats crap. PS360 versions of Blops 2 are just as capable of those graphics. It has nothin to do with the power of the system, rather the development of the franchise. Try again.

PS360 are capable of those graphics after 6-7 years of developer experience and optimisation. Wii U did it at birth, on crappy dev kits.



curl-6 on 23 June 2013
DevilRising said:
curl-6 said:
DevilRising said:
 


That was the point. PS3 was significantly more powerful hardware than 360, but I'm not sure that even any Sony development teams ever really fully tapped that potential. Like you say, on par with 360 games, in most cases because with third party titles, they developed with the 360 in mind, not the PS3.

So certainly, Wii U is more powerful hardware than PS3. But you're not going to see that in especially first wave ports of PS360 titles. You might see it more noticible in a game like Watch Dogs, which they've indicated is taking advantage of the extra power.

Do you have a source for this?

 

This is a good start I suppose:

http://www.gamercenteronline.net/2013/02/26/ubisoft-development-ps3360-version-watch-dogs-hasnt-started-yet/

 

Basically stating that the Wii U version will not be a PS360 port. Meaning it will likely use the PC textures, etc., similar to that recent Need for Speed game, which also looked better than the PS360 versions. I also clearly remember Ubi stating that they plan to try and take full advantage of the Wii U hardware, such as the extra RAM, GamePad functionality, etc.

I dunno, as much as I'd love this to be true, when devs talk about "next gen" these days they tend to mean the Xbone and PS4, so I get the feeling he was talking about those versions.

If Ubisoft planned to take full advantage of the Wii U hardware, (I don't remember them ever saying this) then so far they've done a great job with the controller, but a crappy job with the CPU/GPU/RAM



Around the Network
ninjablade on 23 June 2013
Zero999 said:
ninjablade said:
think-man said:
I've seen games on the Ps3 that look better then them. So yes.

X's is the only one that I would say would be testy but I still think it'll be fine.


this always happens with new consoles, the reality is the wiiu has no games that has shown a noticable  upgrade over current gen, X for example, we have no idea how it runs, and we haven't seen have real gameplay demonstration, just snippets of gameplay, nothing you can really judge from, no direct feed captures, no real real gameplay demonstarion video, just a teasers just shows snippets of gameplay, lots of games on 360/ps3 could have been graphic kings of current gen if they had proper AA, good frame rate, pop in and not be sub hd.

so what? they didn't . it's the same as saying ps2 games could be graphical kings if they had high polygon, textures, HD ...

what does what i'm saying have to do with ps2, i'm talking about wiiu and current gen, wii u games hasn't shown anything  notable above current gen, it not running games at higher resolution, good AA, textures. this remind of sony fans when ps3 came out, when they dragon lair and motor storm could not be done on 360, for example X  is not doing amazing textures, lighting, great AA based of the video, i see sprite based foliage, static lighting and nice draw distance, but RDR looks much more impressive techically to me cause the of the lighting and the use of alpha textures on foliage and wicher 3 looks nextgen compared to both of those, and its easy to see why, textures, lighting, detail, poly count, AA and resolution, and not mention poly count.



Zero999 on 23 June 2013
ninjablade said:
Zero999 said:
ninjablade said:
think-man said:
I've seen games on the Ps3 that look better then them. So yes.

X's is the only one that I would say would be testy but I still think it'll be fine.


this always happens with new consoles, the reality is the wiiu has no games that has shown a noticable  upgrade over current gen, X for example, we have no idea how it runs, and we haven't seen have real gameplay demonstration, just snippets of gameplay, nothing you can really judge from, no direct feed captures, no real real gameplay demonstarion video, just a teasers just shows snippets of gameplay, lots of games on 360/ps3 could have been graphic kings of current gen if they had proper AA, good frame rate, pop in and not be sub hd.

so what? they didn't . it's the same as saying ps2 games could be graphical kings if they had high polygon, textures, HD ...

what does what i'm saying have to do with ps2, i'm talking about wiiu and current gen, wii u games hasn't shown anything  notable above current gen, it not running games at high resolution, good, AA better textures, this remind of sony fans when ps3 came out, when they dragon lair and motor storm could not be done on 360, for example X  is not doing amazing textures, lighting, or AA based of the video, i see sprite based foliage, static lighting and nice draw distance, but RDR looks much more impressive techically to me cause the of the lighting and the use of alpha textures on foliage and wticher 3 looks nextgen compared to both of those, and its easy to see why, textures, lighting, detail, poly count, AA and resolution, and not mention poly count.

do I have to bold it again? ok

you said: lots of games on 360/ps3 could have been graphic kings of current gen if they had proper AA, good frame rate, pop in and not be sub hd.

i responded: so what? they didn't . it's the same as saying ps2 games could be graphical kings if they had high polygon, textures, HD ...

and don't come with this crap about "wii u games hasn't shown anything  notable above current gen". I won't waste my time discussing that level of delusion.



ninjablade on 23 June 2013
Zero999 said:
ninjablade said:
Zero999 said:
ninjablade said:
think-man said:
I've seen games on the Ps3 that look better then them. So yes.

X's is the only one that I would say would be testy but I still think it'll be fine.


this always happens with new consoles, the reality is the wiiu has no games that has shown a noticable  upgrade over current gen, X for example, we have no idea how it runs, and we haven't seen have real gameplay demonstration, just snippets of gameplay, nothing you can really judge from, no direct feed captures, no real real gameplay demonstarion video, just a teasers just shows snippets of gameplay, lots of games on 360/ps3 could have been graphic kings of current gen if they had proper AA, good frame rate, pop in and not be sub hd.

so what? they didn't . it's the same as saying ps2 games could be graphical kings if they had high polygon, textures, HD ...

what does what i'm saying have to do with ps2, i'm talking about wiiu and current gen, wii u games hasn't shown anything  notable above current gen, it not running games at high resolution, good, AA better textures, this remind of sony fans when ps3 came out, when they dragon lair and motor storm could not be done on 360, for example X  is not doing amazing textures, lighting, or AA based of the video, i see sprite based foliage, static lighting and nice draw distance, but RDR looks much more impressive techically to me cause the of the lighting and the use of alpha textures on foliage and wticher 3 looks nextgen compared to both of those, and its easy to see why, textures, lighting, detail, poly cout, AA and resolution, and not mention poly count.

do I have to bold it again? ok

you said: lots of games on 360/ps3 could have been graphic kings of current gen if they had proper AA, good frame rate, pop in and not be sub hd.

i responded: so what? they didn't . it's the same as saying ps2 games could be graphical kings if they had high polygon, textures, HD ...

and don't come with this crap about "wii u games hasn't shown anything  notable above current gen". I won't waste my time discussing that level of delusion.

 

please show me these direct feed pics that show the upgrade. the wiiu is gonna be out for a year and it won't have the best looking game in any genre this year compared to current gen.



Zero999 on 23 June 2013
ninjablade said:

 

please show me these direct feed pics that show the upgrade. the wiiu is gonna be out for a year and it won't have the best looking game in any genre this year compared to current gen.

Pictures are everywhere inlcuding in this topic. it's not my problem if you just ignore them and keep lying to yourself.



ninjablade on 23 June 2013
Zero999 said:
ninjablade said:

 

please show me these direct feed pics that show the upgrade. the wiiu is gonna be out for a year and it won't have the best looking game in any genre this year compared to current gen.

Pictures are everywhere inlcuding in this topic. it's not my problem if you just ignore them and keep lying to yourself.

baynetta 2 and mario kart 8, look like current gen games to me, then you have X which doesn't have any direct feed pics.