ninjablade said:
Zero999 said:
ninjablade said:
think-man said:
I've seen games on the Ps3 that look better then them. So yes.
X's is the only one that I would say would be testy but I still think it'll be fine. |
this always happens with new consoles, the reality is the wiiu has no games that has shown a noticable upgrade over current gen, X for example, we have no idea how it runs, and we haven't seen have real gameplay demonstration, just snippets of gameplay, nothing you can really judge from, no direct feed captures, no real real gameplay demonstarion video, just a teasers just shows snippets of gameplay, lots of games on 360/ps3 could have been graphic kings of current gen if they had proper AA, good frame rate, pop in and not be sub hd.
|
so what? they didn't . it's the same as saying ps2 games could be graphical kings if they had high polygon, textures, HD ...
|
what does what i'm saying have to do with ps2, i'm talking about wiiu and current gen, wii u games hasn't shown anything notable above current gen, it not running games at high resolution, good, AA better textures, this remind of sony fans when ps3 came out, when they dragon lair and motor storm could not be done on 360, for example X is not doing amazing textures, lighting, or AA based of the video, i see sprite based foliage, static lighting and nice draw distance, but RDR looks much more impressive techically to me cause the of the lighting and the use of alpha textures on foliage and wticher 3 looks nextgen compared to both of those, and its easy to see why, textures, lighting, detail, poly cout, AA and resolution, and not mention poly count.
|
