By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Microsoft Clarify Family Sharing, Wasn’t Only Demos

LordMatrix said:
Just_Rocco said:

LOL. So, they MUST be lying? Give it a rest. The bitching displayed in this thread already is why we'll never truly know what they had planned at launch.

Somehow, M$ gets bashed for both bad and good PR? WTF?

 

Yes Microsoft made a bad choice overall but more so due to the world not really being ready for an online centric console yet. Seemed one generation too soon really.

I'm getting pretty sick of people saying this as if this was what was threatening XBoxone's viability. MS wasn't ready for an online centric console because their gaming was still centred around selling discs. if MS was going to go all online they should have nixed any disc drive and gone 100% download. I bet an download only console would have sold better than a BRD DRM infested console. Always online / 24hr check in were only ever elements required to support BRD DRM. All other aspects of MS's online "vision" can still be implemented.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Around the Network
KINGviATor said:
That is what they say now to get more "good PR". Be like, "oh, this is what you guys made us change. Hope you're happy ass holes. Suck it."


That's exactly how i feel, they're trying as hard as the can to spin this in their favor and make it look like they were a victim.



CURRENTLY PLAYING:  Warframe, Witcher 2

badgenome said:
But way worse off than we are right now when it comes to retail games.

And in the unlikely event that the feature would have worked as Microsoft wanted you to think it would have, third parties would have killed it anyway

I seriously can't believe you compared select games being part of the PS+ subscription with being able to play all your friends' games for free in their entirety.

 

As it stands, one can loan and sell a disc to an unlimited amount of people who can play a game in entirety. What's so hard to understand?



Stinky said:

As it stands, one can loan and sell a disc to an unlimited amount of people who can play a game in entirety. What's so hard to understand?

The part where they're trying to stop this because it's so bad for the industry while simultaneously implementing a system to enable you to do just that with up to 9 other people (or perhaps infinite other people, assuming you would have been free to leave one family group and join another). And not just people you know in real life, but random people you've met on the internet.

Maybe it's not actually so hard to understand. It's just impossible to believe.



badgenome said:
Stinky said:

As it stands, one can loan and sell a disc to an unlimited amount of people who can play a game in entirety. What's so hard to understand?

The part where they're trying to stop this because it's so bad for the industry while simultaneously implementing a system to enable you to do just that with up to 9 other people (or perhaps infinite other people, assuming you would have been free to leave one family group and join another). And not just people you know in real life, but random people you've met on the internet.

Maybe it's not actually so hard to understand. It's just impossible to believe.

I don't recall MS stating that sharing was bad for the industry, but that family sharing is the tradeoff for losing transferrable physical media. I assume that the catch to this was that jumping family groups was not possible or at least very restricted. And that family groups are mutually exclusive. And again, it's nothing you can't already do with discs.

This is all beside the point, you are tilting at windmills because this has been and gone.



Around the Network
Zappykins said:
It’s really sad we, as gamers, lost so many cool new features. The way people are attacking Microsoft reminds me of how fundamentalist attack science. They just want to out yell and out scream to 'prove' they are right.

Never bothering with facts, ideas, or that they don't have to sacrifice their ideas, but may need to adjust them a bit.

Or how supposedly enlightened people attack religion.

Human nature, it sucks.



Stinky said:

I don't recall MS stating that sharing was bad for the industry, but that family sharing is the tradeoff for losing transferrable physical media. I assume that the catch to this was that jumping family groups was not possible or at least very restricted. And that family groups are mutually exclusive. And again, it's nothing you can't already do with discs.

This is all beside the point, you are tilting at windmills because this has been and gone.

The circle of people you know IRL with an Xbox is pretty limited, so most people aren't going to share games with nine real life friends. This would virtually guarantee that every single copy of every single game will be shared with at least nine friends.

If you think it's so pointless to discuss this feature, then you are free to stop discussing it.



Like I said when this rumor first appeared.. it makes no sense whatsoever. The only excuse the people bitching could come up with is MS wanted a feature to kind of make you forget about DRM. So how are they going to do that with a worthless demo share feature LOL. And that's after they'd spent weeks marketing and talking it up as if it's a full game share LOL. Yeah, people are going to be perfectly ok with the ability to share demos.

A more likely scenario is the one described on multiple websites since this rumor surfaced. You can share full games just like MS described, there are just restrictions. A limit on how long you can play a title per day. A limit on how much of it you can access. A limit on how much of it you can play before being prompted you buy it. Things that would make publishers happy. But demos.. LOL.

Too bad we'll never know since some gamers are afraid of change.



J_Allard said:
Like I said when this rumor first appeared.. it makes no sense whatsoever. The only excuse the people bitching could come up with is MS wanted a feature to kind of make you forget about DRM. So how are they going to do that with a worthless demo share feature LOL. And that's after they'd spent weeks marketing and talking it up as if it's a full game share LOL. Yeah, people are going to be perfectly ok with the ability to share demos.

A more likely scenario is the one described on multiple websites since this rumor surfaced. You can share full games just like MS described, there are just restrictions. A limit on how long you can play a title per day. A limit on how much of it you can access. A limit on how much of it you can play before being prompted you buy it. Things that would make publishers happy. But demos.. LOL.

Too bad we'll never know since some gamers are afraid of change.

are you this dumb? 

they said is was gonna work the way they said it would. Share and play the whole game.



papamudd said:
ironmanDX said:
papamudd said:
Fanboys will blindly believe anything they read that promotes their way of thinking..

Not sure who you're referring too... Sony or MS... It could count as both!


Oh i think it goes beyond just those two  


Not here in this thread... MS confirmed the demo sharing was not the case, that it was full title sharing yet people here desperately cling to it as fact.