By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Angry Joe interviews Major Nelson

Tagged games:

he looked so mad lol, i don't think he was expecting those questions lol



Around the Network

Another positive thing for X1 owners, He said they (a while after launch) will probably be more aggressive when it comes to digital discounts, that was when angry joe asked him if they are going to make huge sales like steam.



Nelson was very defensive in this interview, I still like him though. He's a way better PR person than Don Mattrick.



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

ethomaz said:

Guys... the Major Nelson made a mistake.

It is 2 people at the same time. But when 2 people at the same time its for singleplayer only. Also the other 8 people are not locked out from playing other games in the shared library. DLC is also shared.

First about that Gaf thread you posted

All MS has to do is make the cool features of downloading the physical game to the cloud OPTIONAL.

This means if you want to all of the Cloud benefits like sharing with 10 people etc. Then that's your option to tie the game to your profile at that point. You would then fall under those applicable restrictions.

If not, then you should be able to play you Xbox One games as normal and share, trade etc at will to ANY retailer etc.

This would ease people into the digital world, while preventingthe potential of gamers to face their console locking them away from their physical game that they just bought that day, because their internet was down for a few days.

This also would allow the Navy to play their games offline as was recently brought up.


This has some techical difficulties, as not all retailers will have a way to check if you have tied the game to your account. (Unless there is a tamper proof way to visually mark the disc)



I think it would be simpler and preferable to keep the disc as the master copy.
Always allow off-line play from the disc. For online play you tie the disc to your account, which also enables family share etc.
Trade your disc or give it away and when the next person install it for online play it will be removed from your account.

2 people can play off-line, only 1 can play online.

This also has some technical difficulties. The reason why 2 can play off-line at the same time might be because of the 24h grace period on the primary console. You can always start your game within the 24h period, but it can't kick off your family member playing that game. (Who probably has to be online to do so to prevent from additional family members launching the game)

So to prevent 3 playing at once (primary, 1 family member, 1 off-line disc), Nelson's library analogy could help, meaning you have to 'check in' your digital game to your shared library after you're done playing before a family member can 'check out' the game. That can be automatic ofcourse but requires online. Although that would also mean that you need to be online to start your game again later. Not a big problem, since you still have the disc to play off-line.

So a minor inconvenience when your internet is out and you're still within the 24h period and you have checked your game into your shared library, you have to put in the disc.
Yet it solves all ownership worries, taking the console off-line, trade restrictions, and it's easy to implement. There a more consumer friendly console then ps4.
Only downfall is, no server sales to participating retailers, no way for publishers to restrict 2nd hand sales.



That is not a good idea to MS. But it is cool for the xbox one owners. If me and 9 other friends buy a Xbox One, we can put ourselves as family and share 10 games, like a time-sharing gaming library. It will be cool, but sales will drop a LOT.
That is an interesting feature.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

Around the Network
ethomaz said:

Major Nelson said it will check with engineers about a ideia started on GAF to implement a offline play option (withou share, cloud, internet, etc) to resolve the Xbone problem.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=591726

Seems a cools ideia and can make happy everyone.


so simple and so obvious.   it would eliminate all the BS parts of their system without eliminating any of their features.   why didn't MS think about this prior to the reveal?



The shared game thing seem like a pretty good feature, why isn't MS shouting this to the moon?? It would be a huge way to combat the negative perception of sharing limitation, especially if the ability extend to friends as they implied.




ethomaz said:

Zizzla_Rachet said:

LOL!

That is no where near the same....

It is... the ideia of my friend was with my game... so just it can play it... they make the plan to works like in real-life share games.

A example...

My roommate have Halo 4 so I ask to him to share it... I get the game and started to play... while I'm playing he can't play... so I stop to play so it can take the game and play again.

The exactly same ideia... just more easy because it is online without physical contact.

was one exception to this, when my bro picked up FF13 he played through the first disk and once he got to the second one he gave me the first to see what I thought of it. 2 people playing 1 copy of the game. I dunno I just so much preferred the Xbox360s "Jump in" style of gaming.... not the Xbones "jump through hoops" to play :(



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

ethomaz said:



So if you want to play a MP game with these 10 friends... you will need 10 copies of the game.

There are the GOOD and the BAD part.

 

How is that a bad part? It's normal...



I guess this is good for people already planning on buying the XBO; but I really could not care less. I love my disks; I want to actually own the games I buy; so I dont support the XBO.