By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Quarter to Three does it again! Ruins TLoU metacritic

They're just seeking cheap web traffic, don't give it to them.



Around the Network

3/5? Low but it's just an opinion. The problem with Metacritic and a 5 point scale is that small differences in score translate greatly on Metacritic.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

LemonSlice said:
"A survival game without meaningful death isn’t a survival game. It’s just a game."

They make a good point. You should die for real when you die in the game. I mean the PS3 should kill you.


This.



TheNoobHolocaust said:
LemonSlice said:
"A survival game without meaningful death isn’t a survival game. It’s just a game."

They make a good point. You should die for real when you die in the game. I mean the PS3 should kill you.


This.



Makes sense really... Who wouldn't want to risk death while playing games... They do it all the time in Asia with WoW



J_Allard said:
Only a 95 now. Ruined!

And wow, I love that review. Maybe I should read some of the others ones that site has caught shit for.

Like his Halo 4 review?



Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Instead of bashing the reviewer for bias or claiming that he was fishing for hits with a troll review, perhaps you guys should consider that The Last of Us isn't all that. I've seen promotional material for the game where the developers hadn't even bothered to add colors yet, a clear sign of a halfassed job. Maybe the game is also lacking in mature themes (i.e. necrophilia and pedophilia) which the reviewer didn't like. The Last of Us had a lot of potential, but maybe it's just another shooter.


....best post of thread lol!



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23

brendude13 said:
J_Allard said:
Only a 95 now. Ruined!

And wow, I love that review. Maybe I should read some of the others ones that site has caught shit for.

Like his Halo 4 review?

Halo is boring enough, I don't want to read a review about it.



J_Allard said:
brendude13 said:
J_Allard said:
Only a 95 now. Ruined!

And wow, I love that review. Maybe I should read some of the others ones that site has caught shit for.

Like his Halo 4 review?

Halo is boring enough, I don't want to read a review about it.


Okay it's not as good as previous ones, but 1/5, really? 

That implies that the game is barely playable.



When you're that far off from what your peers are scoring (9+ points lower on average), something's wrong.

They should throw out the highest and lowest, like diving, or throw this reviewer out completely. The reviews at this point are consistently low on highly rated games. Once is a unique opinion, a few times is a trend, this is something else entirely.



Told you guys he'd do it.