iceland said:
mantlepiecek said:
iceland said:
mantlepiecek said:
Are people comparing paying for PS+ and paying for gold? They are vastly different, and plus is ridiculously amazing for somebody who has more than one PS console that supports it.
It is still not a rip-off like gold was and is. People like me who don't like to pay a subscription for anything will have a problem with it.
|
Are they vastly different?
Both now require a paywall to access multiplayer
Both offer exclusive deals for the service
Now the only difference is that Sony lets you borrow games as long as you have the service
Unless I'm missing something big, for the record I've always been against paying for multiplayer I just find it so jarring that Sony fans are now fine with the argument they've been using since the ps3 came out. Now that gold is getting free games on 360 and if they keep that going into Xbox One, is there much of a difference if any?
|
Yeah, they are very different. You get twelve games or something on PS3, and then there discounts, PS Vita games if you have a PS Vita, and on top of that PS4 games. It is not going to be called a rip-off by anyone, that is for sure.
|
Okay so the "free games" is the only difference. Xbl has discounts (not sure if you knew that). I'm not saying it's a rip-off or trying to call people out. I'm just genuinely surprised that there isn't more of an uproar for the paywall behind MP as I thought a lot of Sony fans were against it, That's all.
|
The discounts are crazy though. They are there all the time; and during sale the regular PSN guys get some discounts, plus guys get like 20-30% more.
For eg, it is common to see $10 games go on sale and cost $7, plus guys pay something like $4.
Also free games have turned out to be day 1 games in many situations - like stacking upon release on PSN was free for PS+, there have been others like this.
There is no other difference though.
I am still against it. I am sure there are quite a few people who are against it, frankly. It is stupid to charge for online.