@Seth what do you think about the Nazi's coming in contact with extraterrestrial beings? I know you've had to come across it before

@AllenMaher, I have not seen anything that debunks it that isn't based on opinion. Don't come at me when I openly stated that it isn't 100% factual and everything is done with the goal of proving a point like I am backing it as legit. I have seen some of the videos you speak of but you only call them "proof" because they back up your belief. I look at both series with an open mind and have yet to see any factual proof debunking anything shown on the show.
I seriously doubt you can do any of that dude. If you could you wouldn't be arguing because you would already know the things people have brought up, scientist, leading experts in their field admit they cannot do that today. Even if you could it would be meaningless, because its their "opinion" that those people are wrong. They would explain things based on their own opinion on what they think happened but they have no facts to back it up.

If its so easy to do, why don't you guys that are making that claim just go do it? With no machinery you can make meters long engravings in stone that wont vary from one side to the other by less than a human hair? You can make rocks so perfectly cut they don't even need mortar to stay together?

See you are the type of person I really dislike the most. You act like a know it all but really don't know what you are talking about. You insult others and try to belittle them into agreeing with you or trying to make your opinion seem more valid to others.

Just because one archeologist believes it was a dinner plate doesn't mean the other 5 do too. Even in science today we have scientist that do not agree. That doesn't make your side more valid than the other. Hell even the ancient aliens guys are bias. In every case it must have been an alien it could have easily been God or some other deity but they refuse to acknowledge that possibility because it goes against their beliefs much the same way most of the debunkers are using the opinions of people in the field that believe as they do.

Nobody can explain why an aerodynamic model of a bird was found in the tomb of a king with a tail wasn't flat like a birds but like an actual airplanes tail section. You and anyone else might be able to speculate as to why but considering the greatest minds of our time were a mail clerk and a C student at MIT I don't exactly take every scientists opinions over anyone else simply because people let what they believe in determine what they see or don't see.

I sit and debunk some things they say on the show(Mainly that it had to be aliens and nothing else )and I debunk some things they use to debunk Ancient Aliens.

Most religious people are close minded.
It's the sad truth

There is a branch of archalology where they do replicate ancient techniques by trying them, including stone fitting, moving large stones, and carving without machines.  The techniques do work with a little practice.

The cutting rocks one is actually a lot more simple than it looks, you cut a stone till it looks like it will fit, then put sand on the stone you are matching it too.  Find the uneven indentation marks in the sand and then work on those areas some more.  I have seen this demonstrated.

A stone the size of the ones at stonehenge was moved by experimental archeologists with tools available at the time.

http://www.engineering-timelines.com/how/stonehenge/stonehenge_01.asp

Some trial and error and 130 people got the job done.

As for the human hair claim... do you have a verifiable source?  A line in tension as a guide, like a chalk line, might be a place to start on that one.

"If its so easy to do, why don't you guys that are making that claim just go do it?"

Archeologists do go out and do that, so do scientists.  Thier work is reviewed critically by experts. The show Ancient aliens makes fantastic claims and offers no real evidence. It Ignores or contradicts things which people have already "gone out and done" and had peer veviewed.

Frankly I don't care if you think I am "the type of person [you] really dislike the most."

The show bugs me because it tosses out wild unsubstantiated claims that sucks a lot of people in. Shows like that on a channel that at one time had actual educational value (it was not proffitable so they got rid of it) just make the general populace dumber.