I use it most of the time so yes
Visually it is amazing
Which do you prefer? | |||
| Glasses Free 3D | 152 | 87.36% | |
| 3D using Glasses | 22 | 12.64% | |
| Total: | 174 | ||
I use it most of the time so yes
Visually it is amazing
| Miguel_Zorro said: I can't stand 3D with glasses. It gives me a headache and I don't feel as immersed in the movie because of the presense of the glasses - which runs counter to the purpose of 3D. They're all usually too small for my massive head. |
Ah, that's understandable, though I thought 3D in general can be rough on the head. I think it just takes time getting used to, as I had similar problems with it at first, but now I can play Sonic Generations for hours without any blacklash.
Also, don't get the wrong idea here. I love the notion of glasses free 3D, as I'm just a 3D enthusiast in general. It's just the sweet spot thing that is putting it under Glasses 3D for me. Once that issue is taken of, which'll hopefully be by the next system, then I'll glady say it's superior to using glasses, since you know, why you use glasses when you can get the same thing without them.
F0X said:
|
| DieAppleDie said: I use it most of the time so yes Visually it is amazing |
Einsam_Delphin said:
Do you like 3D itself? How has the 3DS's 3D been treating you? |
I don't like them only for the lowered brightness and what I already mentioned. Never tried 3DS.

GameAnalyser said:
|
In hindsight I think Nintendo would've opted not to build the DS successor around the 3D concept, but hindsight is 20/20. They probably felt like they needed some kind of "hook" and that was the best they could come up with.
Unfortunately for them when the system didn't sell well initially, it burned them and they had to eat a hardware loss which led to their first fiscal loss in company history. That type of 3D screen is a custom component and was likely pretty expensive.
| Soundwave said: In hindsight I think Nintendo would've opted not to build the DS successor around the 3D concept, but hindsight is 20/20. They probably felt like they needed some kind of "hook" and that was the best they could come up with. Unfortunately for them when the system didn't sell well initially, it burned them and they had to eat a hardware loss which led to their first fiscal loss in company history. That type of 3D screen is a custom component and was likely pretty expensive. |
3D glasses were, are and always will be a horrible idea. It's a gimmick and little else. Until HDTVs start coming out with 3D glass technology, the whole 3D thing is just a niche market for IMAX theaters.

The Carnival of Shadows - Folk Punk from Asbury Park, New Jersey
http://www.thecarnivalofshadows.com
![]()
I don't really care about 3D but this glasses free tv tech gets me wondering whether it's possible to do glasses free simulview or multiview. I know it works in car nav systems, driver sees sat nav, passenger can watch tv on the same screen. Why not do it for tv's, upto 4 different programs simultaneously, together with directional audio speakers.
Or 2 way 3D on each side with surround audio remixed to the left and right side of the room for each program.