sales2099 said:
Companies change things all the time. Sony once said rumble was last gen. That changed. So they wen't back on a previous business call, any corporation is free to make amendments down the road if it is for the better. |
sales2099 said:
Companies change things all the time. Sony once said rumble was last gen. That changed. So they wen't back on a previous business call, any corporation is free to make amendments down the road if it is for the better. |
But arent most of these media features already implemented in other devices and even done better? IE smartTVs Tablets, etc.?
maverick40 said:
|
Cant see anything
the2real4mafol said: I'm sorry but you don't announce a console and for the first 20 minutes talk about features that are available elsewhere. So what if you watch TV on it, why does it need to do that? Why should i care about Kinect? Why tell us that it can do skype at the conference? It's built for games and it should show that. They are foolish to not try to sell it to their core base, gamers. I wanted this to be a great competition to the Wii U and PS4 but they have really shot themselves in the foot. Haven't they seen the damage ignoring the key audience did with the Wii? Personally, i want a device that does it job perfectly than be an average jack of all trades. Is that too much to ask? |
Playstation
kowenicki said: I think perhaps gamers need to get over themselves. |
Yeah i mean, its not a gamer website after all.
Its like going to a bar and telling people upset that they dont serve beer to get over themselves and drink orange juice.
oniyide said:
|
Or Nintendo for that matter, both of which i will get at one point or another. Microsoft's focus on multimedia is still depressing for what is a gaming console
Xbox One, PS4 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch will sell better than Wii U Lifetime Sales by Jan 1st 2018
sales2099 said:
By that comment I meant something truly broader. There are 11 Halo novels (another on the way), about 6 graphic novels (another annoucned this month), 2 short story novels, Forward Unto Dawn (essentially a movie at 1hr/half minutes), and now a guaranteed 1 seasons worth of a TV series. MS gets money and the fans get what they love. I have never seen such dedication to a select fanbase. And unlike things like Star Wars that have been completely dumbed down, 343 is extremely strict with how the lore is portrayed. Again, for that, MS has my loyalty for the foreseable future. |
While I respect that (especially if they managed to maintain a high standard across all media, as I haven't personally read any of it) I'm not sure it is that unique. Take Mario; it has TV series, anime, comics, manga, a film and endless merchandise. Zelda has a similar amount, with books and concerts as well. Newer series, like Uncharted and Resistance, have novels and comics as well. It seems to be pretty common across the industry.
I hope you are right about the dedication to the fanbase. The XO reveal was a bit worrying. While the idea of a Halo TV series is amazing, I don't like the idea of the series becoming more TV show than game series.
PSN: Osc89
NNID: Oscar89
sales2099 said: And hey, worst case, this new/used game, required internet stuff, it can be all fixed with a firmware update. Plenty time for MS to get their act together. |
I don't think Microsoft has a set time-frame atm.
The way DRM works on the Xbox One is essentially the same as the way it works on the Xbox 360, the major component difference is that built into the Xbox One (and a part of Windows 8 RT) is an authentication process for software. When each console is created, there is a hard-coded key generated for it. The software checks this key, determines whether it's legitimate, as well as a few other checks, and authenticates locally. At some point in the process, the Xbox One has to check in and verify the software key at home.
It doesn't actually do this just for games, it does this for every aspect of the software, including the OS. Unlike with any prior version of Windows or even Xbox OS, the Xbox One validates itself constantly to ensure that the software hasn't been tampered with. You can think of this as anti-consumer, but in a much wider scope it exists to ensure that the integrity of the system (the OS) remains intact all the time. So, for example, a virus or malware can't infect and infiltrate the system.
I don't know why it has been suggested 24 hours, because there are two givens here. One, there is no need to check to phone home every 24 hours. The system can authenticate itself locally. It can be dialed back to once a week or even once a month. Second, functionality can be limited based on the key given by the software. A retail copy can have a key that allows certain functionality until authenticated, and a downloadable copy can allow other functionality until authenticated.
Given this bit of information, I don't think Microsoft has these plans worked out entirely. Therefore, I think that's why you have part of Microsoft saying relativley little about the subject, and then you have Phil.
the2real4mafol said:
Or Nintendo for that matter, both of which i will get at one point or another. Microsoft's focus on multimedia is still depressing for what is a gaming console |
thats a viable option, I guess if i had to get one, it would be one of those two
sony has nothing to wrorry about. i will never buy the new xbox one
VITA 32 GIG CARD.250 GIG SLIM & 160 GIG PHAT PS3