RenCutypoison said:
KungKras said: It's going to be expensive, and try to sell in an economic depression. It's not gonna get the low end customer. So we can safely rule out any disruption. |
Nothing sells better than luxury goods and service during the crisis. Goods affected the most by crisis is food. Sad, I know.
|
The video game market is already severely crippled by the global economy though.
But anyway, I probably made a poor argument, let me try to explain my impression of it, since I've actually read The Innovator's Dilemma.
The Xbox one gives me the vibe that it tries to be disruptive. A disruptor is supposed to evolve its disruptive technology until that technology can satisfy users of the incumbent technology, so them evolving Kinect seems like a good idea on paper. However, Kinect never really had the disruptive potential of the Wii remote to begin with. And all the bloat that Microsoft is adding to the console with media functionality is not the same as expanding upon disruptive innovation. AND they are upping the graphic up to the 8th gen standard. It's a good example of what Cristensen calles "cramming". It's like the "Hydro Hoe" that cable-driven digging machine manufacturers made to compete with fully hydraulic digging machine. All it did however was to combine hydraulics with the traditional technology, which made it appeal to neither the high-end nor the low-end.
To me, they're just trying too many different things with the console for it to be disruptive.