PerfectDark said:
WebMasterFlex said:
PerfectDark said:
Too late. Gen is over. Each place is set in stone. |
Your post is probably the most pathetic damage control I have ever seen. It's over when there will be no more PS3 and 360 for sale. Each week you will have numbers. Better get used to it... next year, there will still be PS3 and 360 on the charts. DWI..
|
Not damage control at all. Its not over when the systems arent on sale,if that was the dase then ps2 was still in the war with gc and xbox and we know that is not true. its over when new systems are out. 7-8 years in last place means they failed this gen. the xbox 360 was "the" console this gen. Just look around and mostly erveryone plays 360 mainly.
|
How can you say the gen is over, when Microsoft and Sony as still developing brand new games for the 360 and PS3? If the gen is over, MS and Sony would have completly shifted focus.
The generation is ending, but it's not over.
PerfectDark said:
pezus said:
That is some perfect logic for you.
PS3 was in "last place" for 7-8 years despite outselling 360 the vast majority of the weeks? 360 was "the" console this gen, despite being 23m below Wii? How do you justify this?
|
Wii won this gen but in terms of the main console it was the xbox 360. ps2 was "the" console last gen,etc. PS3 has been in last for years,what do you mean weeks? Overall if what i mean and that is what matters.
|
Overall PS3 has sold more units, so isn't that what matters?
Also I own a 360 and a Wii, and I play the Wii more, so I don't know what you mean by 360 being the winner in terms of "main console." Most people on this forum who have both a PS3 and a 360 use the PS3 as their "primary console" and keep the 360 for the exclusives.
