if true i might get the ps4 version instead by the time it's released and localised i'll probably have one.

I may be misinterpreting your post -- so please correct me if I'm wrong -- but are you saying Final Fantasy XIII was the worst FF game because it was not a Sony exclusive?

So did I read his post and I am also quite confused. I don't see why this would be a valid argument for FF XIII crap.

The game was really bad for FF standards. But that was not X360's port fault.

Nobody cares about this running joke of a game anymore.

FFXIII had half of the content slashed and the quality had to be downgraded due the 360 version... that is pretty much known by anybody

So you have any proof for that? I see absolutely no reason for this technically.

I think it's really hard for a game of that magnitute to be exclusive. it will probably be cross gen too.

Proof is always good with claims like that.

The only thing caused by the 360 port was dev time. The game would have been out 12 Months earlier and sold just like XIII did. The 360 has nothing to do with content being cut.

The content was cut because of balance and volume concerns. They didnt want to add stuff that they thought people didnt need or want.

I have proof... the playable demo showed by SE six months before the 360 the new playable be showed was a lot better than the final game in graphic terms.

A SE excutive said itself that the cut content removed from the game due the multiplat was enougth to make a new FF game.

And I will not complain about the fact the PS3 had to be delayed one year after finished to wait the 360 port and to be fixed to have comparable quality with the other version.

But MS paid for that so I think that's fine after all..