PS4 and XBOX 720 GPUs anyways only work with 2GB RAM.

"that much more than it does today" Tomb Raider needed 5 million units sold "today," if tomorrow they only needed 5 million and 1, well, they still wont be able to match it.

Costs go up with every gen, simply because, like you said, the games get bigger.  I do agree that "porting" will be easier, and with new tech it could be very easy to port games to the ps4/720/pc, but it will also be easier and cheaper to downscale games to the 3ds/psv/wiiU, which because of those high costs, this may end up being required to make a profit.  

YES IT IS!  4 =/= 1 !  It's like some of you don't even realize how rediculous you sound.  It would take at least 2.5 GB pf Ram to even try to run next gen games.  Not to mention you would need a GPU stronger than a cut down HD 6570 + 1.24 GHz Xbox 360 CPU to even use that much!  Nintendo massively dropped the ball in performance yet again!

I find it funny the 4 GB reserved story... for what? this is hmmm - yet another twist / spin.

You can call it dropping the ball. People who have followed the industry long enough know that it's called winning.

bolded: say facts not random sh*t you invented. also, have you ever heard of a little something called scalability? drop resolution from 1080p to 720p and reduce some effects here and there and omg, it's totally runing on wii u. i just don't understand haters, they're alreaddy not going to buy wii u, why keep wishing it does'nt get suport?

0,4 TFlops are realistic for Wii U. PS3 has maybe 0.4Tflop. The number comes from the RSX which is an old architecture without unified shaders also old Nvidia which makes a comparison pointless its supposed to theoretically peak at 0.4 Tflops but if we look at the 360 GPU. The first GPU with unified shaders (and its from AMD aswell) it has 0.25 Tflop and is superior to the PS3 GPU. The Cell as found in the PS3 has a theoretical 200gflop with one SPU for security, PS3/360 are roughly in the 0.35 Tflop area.

Wii U is unknown yes but its a small chip and needs low power. PS3/360 need twice as much. Nintendo made an efficency monster but its based on older Architecture and newer AMD FLOPs>older AMD FLOPs.

Also look at the Graphics if Wii U would indeed be twice more powerful than PS3/360 it would be no problem to make all ports from PS3/360 1080p it would not even require much additional effort just up the internal rendering resolution from 720p to 1080p.

Wii U is definetly NOT 2x PS3/360. It might produce better graphics at some point but this is due to modern architecture. The Wii U just has more tricks than PS3/360 not twice the performance. Or we would see it. Unless Nintendo made everyone sign a contract ghat stops developers and themselfd to use all that power for framerate or resolution. 

I could substitute wii u for xbox 360 in your post and would probably look the same as many posts from 7 years ago.

The other factor that not many are considering is that Nintendo tends to iterate console more often. On average Nintendo tends to iterate every 5 years. By the time the new consoles arrive the Wiiu will only have about 4 years left before the Nintendo next gen system. I do think that the Wiiu will run into problems with handle next gen games in a few years when they are maxing out those next consoles but that is nearing the end of the Wiiu lifespan and Nintendo will be prepping something spiffyer than than the PS4 by then.  I'm not too worried about it. Plus with the advent of the mobile market many next gen engines are being made much more scalable so it probably wouldn't be a big deal to have a scaled down version for the wiiu.  Alot of the extra power will go towards 1080p and 60 fps.. If you ran a game at 720p and 30 fps you wouldn't need the high res textures at that point so the ram becomes a bit less meaningfull.