ps1 is doing good at 2d-games, I think, but 3d is just ugly nowadays. Still like the artwork of ff9 though

..remember that the dualshock was supported for like only 30 games.. with I think only Ape Escape and 1 Sypro require it..  (minus the re-releases like Resident Evil Dualshock edition) not even ff7 has support for it.. most played using this baby



ps1 aged badly.. but that's because the Saturn has more lovely 2d games

Yeah, 3D PS1 games have aged the worst.

PS1, followed closely by the N64.  The N64 was quite bit a better at doing 3D but lacked the capability of the PS1 because it was still using cartridriges. Oh and the blurry textures

hinch said: PS1, followed closely by the N64. The N64 was quite bit better in at doing 3D but lacked the capability of the PS1 because it was still using cartridriges. Oh and the blurry textures

fog 64 ;)

The first Playstation by a mile. I am not sure about the Saturn have never seen one in real life. I wanted to say the N64 but there are quite a few games that are still playable today.

The early 3D games really look horrible (Tomb Raider and FF7 come to mind), so yeah the N64 and PS1 aged pretty badly.

none, ps1 games probs the worst but theres still some great ones

i can still go back every once in awhile and play an old nes or snes, genesis games but not ps1 or saturn its big chunks of digital throwup.

Done get this PS1 talk. What games are you talking about? I went through collecting PS1 games I couldn't afford as a kid about a year or so ago and all of them looked nice based on the platform, games like GT, Crash, FF will always look good. Even Jumping Flash looks great. It's nothing to do with the 3D, it's the game, the graphics in it.