nvidia guy looks like it uses the better tech but as long as they don't look 100% real i prefer models which look more like a game character. so i don't really like the nvidia demo guy and prefer the ps4 tech demo guy (except for the hair lol)

i also prefer the the last of us faces much more as the faces in beyond since i think they try to let it look as real as possible in beyond and in the last of us they try to let the characters look good but still like videogame characters. which is quite funny since i prefer the quantic dream guy in this thread.

i also like the two older guys in the agni's philosopy tech demo a lot,  they look very good but still like a videogame character in my eyes.

lol there just won't be any gameplay

If you look at the eyebrow movements and the way how the eyes of the old guy close, Quantic dream's demo simply seems to have edged out the Nvidia's. The Quantic dream's tech video simply breathes more life even with less shading. However when the textures on the skin is put to comparison, the nvidia tech demo simply wins which alone isn't enough for me. I'm not impressed at those eyes and lips(needs more work yet). Too artificial. They don't speak much. This is where the art as a talent comes to display such as the team behind the old guy's demo. Using a tech to display more shading/textures doesn't count. In fact in many of the nvidia videos, the same thing lurks around.

which was supposed to be Analyzer and not analyser.

still does'nt look nearly as great as that pc one. I just don't get how this can even compare. 

Eyes goes to the Cage demo. However overall the 2007 Demo from Nvidia looks much more lifelike and its 5+ years old. Wish we had a current video to compare the PS4 to. But overall easily my vote goes to the Nvidia demo

I give the edge to Nvidia's older demo. Better lighting, shadows, reflections, colour palate, skin tone, and skin detail. The Quantic Dream demo still looks impressive though. And has better eyes too. The big question is will
there be games that look like.........hmmmm ..hasn't been that many so far

.Stumbled on to this website recently, and saw these images.(it's not a link I just copy and paste).They blow me away. The detail is amazing. I have no idea how to do any of that stuff. If it wasn't for the lack of hair, they would look like real photos.

http://www.3dartistonline.com/image/15558/nana_wip

Difference is that one is doable on a next gen system and the other one takes 2 terraflops of compute power which is a little under half of the Titan gpu or almost equal to the ps4's gpu. Hopefully we see maxwell or vota be able to pump out graphics like those.

I hope Jorge Jimmenez shows off more of his work soon, his eye and skin shading stuff looked amazing.

It's really hard to make a comparison. The NVDIA one looks more realistic,

However a lot of that might be because the old guy seems to have gotten a bit "fictionalized" in design in moving from real life to computer model when it comes to face structure.


As for which I prefer? Probably the old dude but mostly because his more fictionalized design looks like a wizard. While Bald guy looks more space marine like or barring that one of those douche bag knights/guards in a fantasy type game.

Wizards are cooler.

I'd have to see similar looking characters before i could make any serious judgement on art design... or at least more assets.  Otherwise, which dude do you like better mostly just breaks down to what i think they'd be used for.

Also.... neither creep me out in the slightest. I never really got the whole uncanny valley stuff. At the very least not in regards to 2D media.

I mean like creepy looking wax statues or really realistic manicans can be kinda freeky cause I can picture them coming to life if i'm having an active imagination day... but 2D stuff? 

I don't get it.