phenom08 said:
|
we can do permaban.
Was Wii a fad? | |||
Yes | 219 | 55.30% | |
No | 147 | 37.12% | |
Hesitant to say one way o... | 29 | 7.32% | |
Total: | 395 |
phenom08 said:
|
we can do permaban.
ninjablade said:
how is selling over 75 million not a success. |
Because its competitors sold more and it lost millions.
dahuman said: I've never seen a fad that lasted this long before in my entire life, so if the Wii is a fad, then so are most things that don't last more than 6 years and didn't sell 100mil, and that category only belongs to the PS2 and Nintendo Handhelds lol. |
there are reasons why wi is considered a fad, sales dropped like a rock and its successer is selling 120,000 units world wide a month. if that's that a fad i don't know what is.
ninjablade said:
we can do permaban. |
What about a bet for this holiday? 2014 is too far from now. Unless you arent as confident in WiiU failing as you claim you are?
ninjablade said:
|
Then the PS2 is a fad since PS3 sold like crap. So is PSP. Sales dropped like a rock for PS1 as well making it a fad. Thanks for the info bud.
phenom08 said:
|
i understand where your coming from, sony made mistake but they are still in the game, huge third party support, still the biggest brand in gaming, currently selling best world wide, they can fix all thos mistakes with ps4 and dominate, ps3 cost sony 840$ to make, while ps4 is looking like 500-550$, huge difference this time.
dahuman said: I've never seen a fad that lasted this long before in my entire life, so if the Wii is a fad, then so are most things that don't last more than 6 years and didn't sell 100mil, and that category only belongs to the PS2 and Nintendo Handhelds lol. |
Backstreet Boys, Skateboarding, Hoola hoops, and almost evey fad I can think of is still around
phenom08 said:
|
selling over 76 million is not crap dude, its great. it will finish at 90 million, how is that bad.
ninjablade said:
|
I wouldn't bother with him. He has no understanding of a concept such as failure/success. He really has no clue what he is talking about and makes absolutly zero sense when trying to make a point. I have reported him 3 seperate times in this thread alone for trolling and being off topic.
ninjablade said:
ps1 was powerful for its time and ps2 was more powerful then any pc on the market for its time, just because a console that released a year and half later were more powerful doesn't mean it was weak and so what if it hasn't made a dime, it not about winning the battle its about winning the war, sony will end up selling over 90 milliion units when this gen is over and in great position for nextgen. |
I don't know if you remember, but during PS2 launch till Dreamcast's death, no PS2 game looked better than Dreamcast games. In fact, every multiplatform between the two looked better on the DC. If the DC lasted the entire generation, the two would probably produce similar looking games. I mean, that's not powerful at all, considering the DC launched one year before the PS2. Also, PS1 received 3D0 ports that looked worse(3D0 launched in 1993, PS1 in 1994). In the end, it was a cheap machine, not meant to be powerful at all, considering PS1's price.