Why is it then?

American culture is far different then central europe and japan. but w/e.

My point was towards core gamers.  Ill do kinect titles for microsoft though. Im still not including move titles in this thread though because this was never geared towards casual players.

Sony boys in full defence because their so great exclusives don't score that good ;)

this post was moderated by axumblade (also in relation to the fact you admitted to flaming Sony fans later on in the thread)

I believe the point of this topic is to discuss how Sony's big awesome games are dropping in quality.  Not about showing which company released more "kiddy" crap or games that are not games reviewers or people on this site would care to play.  Thus why not counting Sing Party.  I doubt a single person on this site even considered that game as a purchase, let alone half probably never even heard of it.

It's a list of games that "we" care about and their ratings.  No one cares about kinetimals or sing party.  So they are pointless in the list.  Everyone will see it and be like "WTF tehy doing there"

They want to see a list of Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo's big guns and their ratings. 

Also it's not about 1st party developer or publishing.  It's about it being an exclusive IP of the company.  Doesn't matter who makes Mario.  Everyone knows mario is a Nintendo game.  Doesn't matter who makes Little Big Planet, everyone knows its a Sony game.

CGI-Quality said: Damn, the PlayStation crew went bananas in here! JayWood - I would applaud a comparison of all three, just to put things in perspective. That and so I won't have to see your head on a silver platter later.

It's done too late.  People want me dead lol Im working on a MSFT one unfortunately.  I only did core titles for PS and i wasnt planning on doing move titles but people are going to be mad as hell if i dont include kinect titles too -_- This wasnt geared towards casuals.  

Well, then this thread serves little purpose. It is no different than the Metacritic thread by Sales2099 to show who has better exclusives, BUT, we can not include any of those exclusives that scored under a 70...

Nope. I set the hype level at low 80s. 360 fans are more level headed.

I think its simply a case of Sony relying on lessor studios whilst they key developers begin work on ps4 titles. 8 decent exclusives are better then none, but I think it'd make more sense next time for them to focus on Quality instead of quantity. Who green lit titles like Star Hawk anyway?? Many of these games had visibly low-mid tier budgets for $60 1st party releases, I hope they're smarter with their investments in future. They are best when they're trying to push the boundaries as opposed to simply shitting out titles for the sake of it.

The only score that has any significance is God of War because Santa Monica is one of their most cherished Dev teams. It should be noted that the team was split in 2, the other side is working on a new ps4 IP. I think the team working God of War just got complacent, they thought multiplayer was enough to warrant another instalment.

well even 4/10 CoD on Vita with less than 1/15 install base sells better than most of this, Sony fans are true elite, hands down