By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - North Korea makes one of the dumbest decisions in history- Decides to Nuke America

 

What an ugly fuck LOL. They won't dare to nuke the U.S, it just won't happen. Literally their entire country will be wiped off the face of the planet. Say what you will about U.S (i'm Canadian), but they have a strong military and they are VERY developed. There is a zero percent chance N. Korea will succeed.



Around the Network
spurgeonryan said:
How much did Germany help allied troops as we invaded them? North Koreans will supposedly help us or leave if we invaded?


The German troops were going hungry by the end both World Wars, but no one fought against their fellow Germans. During the German brainwashing though, the German's still fed their population and didn't have to bring in foreign doctors to help cure relatively basic illnesses. 



R.I.P North Korea



JayWood2010 said:
Assyrian612 said:
JayWood2010 said:
JazzB1987 said:
JayWood2010 said:
JazzB1987 said:
JayWood2010 said:
JazzB1987 said:
NintendoPie said:
Goodness, THE USA are like little children that think they can do whatever they want and not get punished for it.

Stop trying to kill us North Korea! This wouldn't be good for either side.


FIXED   :)   

(just look at what the US of A did during the last 15 years and what bad stuff north korea did in comparison. Can you name 1 really bad thing they did other than going "BLAH BLAH BEWARE OF MIGHTY N.KOREA BLAH!" ? I doubt that)


America may have some problems but we aren't threatening to Nuke someone either.  If N. Korea is so childish to do something like that not ONly will America respond but much of the world will respond.  Nukes are not something to play around with.


Yup  instead the USA invades countries     thats certainly much better :)

N.Korea will never nuke the USA  they are not dumb  people that believe this propaganda shit   should think about it... 

The USA would also not nuke other countries  because now (in comparison to WW2) other countries also have nukes and will take revenge. 

Noone will ever nuke some other country  because that would basically be the end of the world.



Invading a country is much better than nuclear warfare and you know that.  If you don't like America than so be it but don't be childish about the subject either.  Like i said, America has done some thing that has been wrong but in this case we are not wrong.  This is a situation that in my opinion needs to be dealt with and if force is necessary then so be it. I dont agree with needless war but this is a case that effects the entire world so if we attack N. Korea and kill innocent people we are still protecting many more innocent people at the same time.  

Now you can talk all the shit about U.S.A you want but this time i see it hard to to point a finger at us while we are not the ones threatening to nuke someone.  What country are you from?  And if we threatened to nuke you guys how do you think your country would react?  Do you think other countries would react as well?  And damnit this news effects you as well so think before you talk.


I am sorry but your clearly fell for the propaganda shit    dude :)    Invading a country that NEVER DECLARED WAR is not good at all. If you think otherwhise I am really sorry for you.  You also did what they want you to do   You take US-government critic and assume its "I hate america".   Why would I dont like America?
I play American games, I watch American movies, I listen to American music.  I speak English because of AMERICA (as If I would learn English because of Great Britain LOL  :)

The real country/government/whatever  that needs to be dealt with is the lobbyist  assholes all around the world.  That want to earn money.

There is no force needed at all since N.Koreas can say whatever they want within their own territory.   Do you feel the need to force everyone to be like you are?

If you invade countries and in doing so kill innocent people how is this good? Can you guarantee that the other country will attack you ? No you cant.   Remember the Iraq shit?    WE ARE 100% SURE THEY HAVE NUKES, CHEMICAL WEAPONS BLAH.  Guess what nothing!  Don't fall for this shit twice!  Germans felt for the same crap 70 years ago and it feels like Americans are their spiritual successors...

Sure you are not the ones threatening to nuke someone you already threatened the whole world to invade every country that doesnt play by your rules. You do this so great your own population doesnt even think its threatening anymore.   You sabotage other countries economy (sanctions etc.)  Thats certainly better than what N.Koread did (which was just USING WORDS to show the world that they are not IRAQ)

Seriously  think about it.  
You are N.Korea  you deal with your own shit  then there is the USA a huge powerful country that obviously can do whatever it wants because it is part of every major world council.  UN security council/economics/human rights whatever. There is not even 1 thing in the world that has influence without the USA being a part of it or being in full control.

The only way to prevend your country from being f*cked (no matter how shitty it is)  is to come up with  effective ways to defend.  In this case  the easiest way  are nukes which act as a deterrent.


Now there is the USA  they dont want you to have an effective way to defend so they come and tell you to stop having nukes etc.  HOW DUMB IS THIS?
The USA is basically  EA and in this case N.Korea is Nintendo lol.  Ask others to willingly have a disadvantage(Origin/no defence) and if they say NO  act all angry  and punish (no support/sanctions)  WTF?!?


I mean the USA is working on a ANTI NUKE SHIIELD   to have an advantage. People dont want the USA to have this   the USA doesnt care what others want. The usa will have the advantage soon enough....

Conclusion:

  1. The USA wants the be the most powerful country
  2. The USA doesnt want non-kissass-countries to have a way to defend themselves against the USA
  3. The USA mentally and economically attacks those countries with sanctions, threats and anti-non-kissass-country-propaganda
  4. The USA starts to invade those countries as long as the USA knows their defence is weak
  5. The USA places marionette governments there to turn the country into a kissass-country
  6. If 4. is not working then the USA comes up with plan B (in case of N.Korea  NUKE-DEFENCE so the N.Korean nukes will have no effect)
  7. If non kissass-countries don't want the USA to have NUKE-DEFENCE  the USA ignores this because it doesnt have to fear sanctions etc (the USA would not put sanctions on itself)


    Seems fair! 

    P.S. The reason why I have a different view than you is that I am not part of the crap thats going on to the same extent you are a part of it. My view is partially flawed by the somewhat biased media coverage but its not as bad as it could be. And because its just partially biased its easier for me to see the whole picture not just 1 part of it.


Lengthy comment so at least you put thought into it.  I don't agree with you but i appreciate that you put time into it.

I still believe N.Korea is wrong. If they want Nukes for defense that is one thing but they are planning to attack from many statements that has been said in the last few months.  America isn't going to do something until we are pushed and this is pushing the issue.  As far as Iraq, I live in the US and very few people agree with us being in Iraq so we aren't mindless people here like you are making us sound.  And once again Iraq shouldnt have attacked us and we would never have had an excuse to go there in the first place.  i still dont agree with us being there still but that was Iraq's decision to attack america.  

Iraq never attacked America. Obviously you are mindless and need to catch up with the truth rather than what you hear. Al Qaeda attacked the U.S., not Iraq or any of the innocent people that were murdered and still are being murdered bcuz of your genius president bush and his crooks. It is people like you who piss me off here, who act all patriotic, but know nothing except what they believe in the news. Accusing an innocent country then murdering its people and its minorities, then you still have the balls to say Iraq attacked us. LOL Why don't you do a google search. Thanks.


I'm very aware of Al Qaeda being the ones who attacked so once again why are you acting like we are mindless?  They was in Iraq and Afganistan which is why we were over there.  That isn't that hard to figure out now is it?  We aren't over there trying to kill innocent people.  It's not a war like you are acting it is.  We was searching for the leaders of Al Qaeda.  So where is all these innocent people that we went to go kill?  Did you see us bombing Iraq and Afganistan, or even pakistan?  Was we lining civilians up on the streets killing them?  

P.S. Most people dont like Bush or Obama so stop acting like you know shit about the U.S.

U.S was not there to find AL Qaeda, they were there because Bush boy accused Iraq of having WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. I wonder if that rings a bell in your head or do you have to pull some more BS out of your rectum. Here's another thing to figure out genius, most of the terrorists involved were from Saudi Arabia not Iraq, the insurgent groups in Iraq all entered the country from places like Sudan and Iran. All with different affiliations not related to Al Qaeda. So that my boy caused all the civilian massacres while the U.S army remained on the outskirts of the region. You want to know where all the innocent people are? Take a good case. They're all dead. Including my Christian Assyrians who majority are nearly extinct. My family is from Iraq, my father served in the U.S army there, which means I know more then you'll ever think you know about  Iraq.

P.S. Most people don't like BUSH. That I can agree on, but at least Obama has a better standing with other nations such as Russia and Israel. So who deosn't know shit about the U.S? That's clearly you bub.



 

Assyrian612 said:
JayWood2010 said:
Assyrian612 said:
JayWood2010 said:
JazzB1987 said:
JayWood2010 said:
JazzB1987 said:
JayWood2010 said:
JazzB1987 said:
NintendoPie said:
Goodness, THE USA are like little children that think they can do whatever they want and not get punished for it.

Stop trying to kill us North Korea! This wouldn't be good for either side.


FIXED   :)   

(just look at what the US of A did during the last 15 years and what bad stuff north korea did in comparison. Can you name 1 really bad thing they did other than going "BLAH BLAH BEWARE OF MIGHTY N.KOREA BLAH!" ? I doubt that)


America may have some problems but we aren't threatening to Nuke someone either.  If N. Korea is so childish to do something like that not ONly will America respond but much of the world will respond.  Nukes are not something to play around with.


Yup  instead the USA invades countries     thats certainly much better :)

N.Korea will never nuke the USA  they are not dumb  people that believe this propaganda shit   should think about it... 

The USA would also not nuke other countries  because now (in comparison to WW2) other countries also have nukes and will take revenge. 

Noone will ever nuke some other country  because that would basically be the end of the world.



Invading a country is much better than nuclear warfare and you know that.  If you don't like America than so be it but don't be childish about the subject either.  Like i said, America has done some thing that has been wrong but in this case we are not wrong.  This is a situation that in my opinion needs to be dealt with and if force is necessary then so be it. I dont agree with needless war but this is a case that effects the entire world so if we attack N. Korea and kill innocent people we are still protecting many more innocent people at the same time.  

Now you can talk all the shit about U.S.A you want but this time i see it hard to to point a finger at us while we are not the ones threatening to nuke someone.  What country are you from?  And if we threatened to nuke you guys how do you think your country would react?  Do you think other countries would react as well?  And damnit this news effects you as well so think before you talk.


I am sorry but your clearly fell for the propaganda shit    dude :)    Invading a country that NEVER DECLARED WAR is not good at all. If you think otherwhise I am really sorry for you.  You also did what they want you to do   You take US-government critic and assume its "I hate america".   Why would I dont like America?
I play American games, I watch American movies, I listen to American music.  I speak English because of AMERICA (as If I would learn English because of Great Britain LOL  :)

The real country/government/whatever  that needs to be dealt with is the lobbyist  assholes all around the world.  That want to earn money.

There is no force needed at all since N.Koreas can say whatever they want within their own territory.   Do you feel the need to force everyone to be like you are?

If you invade countries and in doing so kill innocent people how is this good? Can you guarantee that the other country will attack you ? No you cant.   Remember the Iraq shit?    WE ARE 100% SURE THEY HAVE NUKES, CHEMICAL WEAPONS BLAH.  Guess what nothing!  Don't fall for this shit twice!  Germans felt for the same crap 70 years ago and it feels like Americans are their spiritual successors...

Sure you are not the ones threatening to nuke someone you already threatened the whole world to invade every country that doesnt play by your rules. You do this so great your own population doesnt even think its threatening anymore.   You sabotage other countries economy (sanctions etc.)  Thats certainly better than what N.Koread did (which was just USING WORDS to show the world that they are not IRAQ)

Seriously  think about it.  
You are N.Korea  you deal with your own shit  then there is the USA a huge powerful country that obviously can do whatever it wants because it is part of every major world council.  UN security council/economics/human rights whatever. There is not even 1 thing in the world that has influence without the USA being a part of it or being in full control.

The only way to prevend your country from being f*cked (no matter how shitty it is)  is to come up with  effective ways to defend.  In this case  the easiest way  are nukes which act as a deterrent.


Now there is the USA  they dont want you to have an effective way to defend so they come and tell you to stop having nukes etc.  HOW DUMB IS THIS?
The USA is basically  EA and in this case N.Korea is Nintendo lol.  Ask others to willingly have a disadvantage(Origin/no defence) and if they say NO  act all angry  and punish (no support/sanctions)  WTF?!?


I mean the USA is working on a ANTI NUKE SHIIELD   to have an advantage. People dont want the USA to have this   the USA doesnt care what others want. The usa will have the advantage soon enough....

Conclusion:

  1. The USA wants the be the most powerful country
  2. The USA doesnt want non-kissass-countries to have a way to defend themselves against the USA
  3. The USA mentally and economically attacks those countries with sanctions, threats and anti-non-kissass-country-propaganda
  4. The USA starts to invade those countries as long as the USA knows their defence is weak
  5. The USA places marionette governments there to turn the country into a kissass-country
  6. If 4. is not working then the USA comes up with plan B (in case of N.Korea  NUKE-DEFENCE so the N.Korean nukes will have no effect)
  7. If non kissass-countries don't want the USA to have NUKE-DEFENCE  the USA ignores this because it doesnt have to fear sanctions etc (the USA would not put sanctions on itself)


    Seems fair! 

    P.S. The reason why I have a different view than you is that I am not part of the crap thats going on to the same extent you are a part of it. My view is partially flawed by the somewhat biased media coverage but its not as bad as it could be. And because its just partially biased its easier for me to see the whole picture not just 1 part of it.


Lengthy comment so at least you put thought into it.  I don't agree with you but i appreciate that you put time into it.

I still believe N.Korea is wrong. If they want Nukes for defense that is one thing but they are planning to attack from many statements that has been said in the last few months.  America isn't going to do something until we are pushed and this is pushing the issue.  As far as Iraq, I live in the US and very few people agree with us being in Iraq so we aren't mindless people here like you are making us sound.  And once again Iraq shouldnt have attacked us and we would never have had an excuse to go there in the first place.  i still dont agree with us being there still but that was Iraq's decision to attack america.  

Iraq never attacked America. Obviously you are mindless and need to catch up with the truth rather than what you hear. Al Qaeda attacked the U.S., not Iraq or any of the innocent people that were murdered and still are being murdered bcuz of your genius president bush and his crooks. It is people like you who piss me off here, who act all patriotic, but know nothing except what they believe in the news. Accusing an innocent country then murdering its people and its minorities, then you still have the balls to say Iraq attacked us. LOL Why don't you do a google search. Thanks.


I'm very aware of Al Qaeda being the ones who attacked so once again why are you acting like we are mindless?  They was in Iraq and Afganistan which is why we were over there.  That isn't that hard to figure out now is it?  We aren't over there trying to kill innocent people.  It's not a war like you are acting it is.  We was searching for the leaders of Al Qaeda.  So where is all these innocent people that we went to go kill?  Did you see us bombing Iraq and Afganistan, or even pakistan?  Was we lining civilians up on the streets killing them?  

P.S. Most people dont like Bush or Obama so stop acting like you know shit about the U.S.

U.S was not there to find AL Qaeda, they were there because Bush boy accused Iraq of having WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. I wonder if that rings a bell in your head or do you have to pull some more BS out of your rectum. Here's another thing to figure out genius, most of the terrorists involved were from Saudi Arabia not Iraq, the insurgent groups in Iraq all entered the country from places like Sudan and Iran. All with different affiliations not related to Al Qaeda. So that my boy caused all the civilian massacres while the U.S army remained on the outskirts of the region. You want to know where all the innocent people are? Take a good case. They're all dead. Including my Christian Assyrians who majority are nearly extinct. My family is from Iraq, my father served in the U.S army there, which means I know more then you'll ever think you know about  Iraq.

P.S. Most people don't like BUSH. That I can agree on, but at least Obama has a better standing with other nations such as Russia and Israel. So who deosn't know shit about the U.S? That's clearly you bub.


Actually that does ring a bell and I had forgotten about the Weapons of Mass Destruction.  That one was my fault.  We were still never there to kill civilians though.  

I am not saying  know a lot on the subject either but you know as well as I do that a lot of things in posts on here has been opinions being stated as if they were true.  I'm not going to go into some tangent with you guys but don't blame america for killing civilians or starting some wars when we have not




       

Around the Network

it is so funny seeing all these american pride comments in here . "yes i am american i can fuck everybody i am the strongest of the world" to me america failed as a nation you are just worldwide record holders of obesity and unhealthy living . an atomic bomb will fix you up once and for all "just kidding"

this post was moderated by axumblade



Chuck Norris needs to be deployed or be the ambassador.



Uhh...Yeah...any weapon launched by North Korea would never even make it to the U.S. Even if it could reach it would just be intercepted. Then North Korea would be carpet bombed into dust.



phinch1 said:
Marks said:
If you nuke N. Korea wouldn't the radiation spread to S. Korea, China, Japan, etc.? So that's not really an option. But obviously we could destroy them without nukes also.


I doubt that, look what happend to you guys in Vietnam


1. US Deaths 58,000 - Vietnamese deaths minimum 500,000... maximum 1,000,000

2. Democracy thriving - Communism dead

All in all things went okay. And that was just an invasion to stop communism. Imagine an actual full on war in retaliation for a nuclear threat? We would devestate them. 



Marks said:

1. US Deaths 58,000 - Vietnamese deaths minimum 500,000... maximum 1,000,000

a) that doesn't rule out a military defeat of the US in the war;

b) in many ways questionable means of war used in this war by the US plus problematic medical treatment of Viet Cong might be a key to understand a high death rates among combatants and non-combatants.