Chark said:
I think there is just a confusion about certain individuals. Like Kowenicki for example. He seems to understand this stuff and is very opinionated. But when it comes to a topic like this, where he has even mentioned that this is Sony's only/best option he still reaks of displeasure. Essentially kicking them when they are down. No one likes "that guy". Sony is restructuring, trying to make a comeback and turn itself around. The more decisions they make that lead to that are good moves. Plugging holes in a sinking ship is the right thing to do regardless of the people who sit there complaining about the ship sinking in the first place. Some just condem for long after the fact.
|
I can agree with that to an extent, but Kowen was bringing up points others wouldn't dream of even being able of thinking that far. For instance, after reading the article carefully (which I know you have because I know you're a good user), it's true that they now have to pay rent and it makes you wonder how that will cost them in the long run. Kowen may come from the perspective that it's hurting them, then I brought up the point that it's a lesser evil because they get some short-term cash they can use.
I agree Kowen can be negative about these things but it's a far cry from saying he wasn't insightful or at least to a certain measure reasonably critical about it. Problem is, to those people I confronted, all they see is "He's critical" or "He's too positive about it", instead of looking at the points people actually raised which are interesting for some of us who visit vgchartz for business discussion in the gaming market.