By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Kojima: Metal Gear Rising is selling well worldwide

ethomaz said:

Anyway I hate the name Metal Gear in this game... so I call it only Rising or Revengeance.


I know. We've already had this conversation xD



Around the Network

Demo was phenomenal, will definitely purchase the game when it gets a bit cheaper. Glad to hear its doing well; anything metal gear seems to be a sure fire hit. 



All of this, of course, is just my opinion.

Skyrim 100%'d. Dark Souls 100%'d. 
Dark Souls > Skyrim.
Halo 4 is the best damn FPS since Halo 3.
Proud pre-orderer of 2 PS4's and an Xbox One. 

Currently Playing: Dark Souls II, South Park
Playstation 4: MGS V GZ, Killzone: Shadow Fall, NBA 2k14.

PureDante said:

Demo was phenomenal, will definitely purchase the game when it gets a bit cheaper. Glad to hear its doing well; anything metal gear seems to be a sure fire hit.

I don't know how was the expectation of this game for Konami but in UK it sold less than Dead Space 3, Aliens and Crysis 3... using the VGC data less than 58k accross all plataforms.

I think it did well in Japan.



Deyon said:
Metal Gear Rising is awesome, reviewers can go F**K them selfs.


but reviewers loved it



PullusPardus said:
Deyon said:
Metal Gear Rising is awesome, reviewers can go F**K them selfs.


but reviewers loved it

79-83 metascore

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/metal-gear-rising-revengeance



Around the Network
Deyon said:
PullusPardus said:
Deyon said:
Metal Gear Rising is awesome, reviewers can go F**K them selfs.


but reviewers loved it

79-83 metascore

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/metal-gear-rising-revengeance

Since when 79-83 is a bad score?



Wright said:
Deyon said:

79-83 metascore

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/metal-gear-rising-revengeance

Since when 79-83 is a bad score?

I didn't say it was a bad score.

When you compare it to games like COD that come out every YEAR and don't bring anything new to the table get 10/10-9/10, It's doesn't seem right.



Deyon said:
Wright said:
Deyon said:

79-83 metascore

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/metal-gear-rising-revengeance

Since when 79-83 is a bad score?

I didn't say it was a bad score.

When you compare it to games like COD that come out every YEAR and don't bring anything new to the table get 10/10-9/10, It's doesn't seem right.


But that does not mean good games deserve 10/10, 9'75/10. This game in particular is a <solid> (hehe) 8 in my eyes. Have flaws, and it is short. Yet, I luv it. That's why acute powers of criticism are in need. The fact that you recognize COD as a franchise that does not deserve those scores mean you already have one.



Deyon said:
Wright said:
Deyon said:

79-83 metascore

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/metal-gear-rising-revengeance

Since when 79-83 is a bad score?

I didn't say it was a bad score.

When you compare it to games like COD that come out every YEAR and don't bring anything new to the table get 10/10-9/10, It's doesn't seem right.

Black Ops II got an 83, 83, 74. metascore. I mean I get your point. But it's not near the difference, and imo the past couple of years reviews have been generally a bit more well rounded.



Platinum def makes some of the best HnS games in the industry. Games like god of war really don't have competing combat systems. Though the DMC reboot was pretty cool.