fordy said:
Turkish said:
fordy said:
Turkish said:
fordy said:
Turkish said:
pezus said:
fordy said:
PullusPardus said:
fordy said: Looks pretty clunky, especially when compared to today's slim ultrabooks. |
how is it clunky?
|
It looks tremendously thick compared to the Sandy Bridge architecture in ultrabooks. Take the Samsung Series 9 for example...
|
wat. How does it look thick?
|
Don't even bother, the Tablet Z is the thinnest 10" tablet, the guy obviously has an agenda as has is recent posts has shown, or he just has bad eyes.
|
Source?
By the way, there are ultrabooks thinner than this
|
It comes straight from the horse's mouth. Which ultrabook is thinner?
|
I already gave the Series 9 as an example, but I wouldn't be suprised if reports come back that Surface is thinner, since it seemed like the only tablet on the market who even came close to the Series 9 in terms of sleekness.
|
Samsung Series 9
12.3" (W) x 8.6" (H) x 0.50" (D)
Xperia Tablet Z: 10.47 x 6.77 x 0.27 inches Please stop spreading bullshit misinformation.
|
How thick is the keyboard attachment? You're only using the screen dimensions.
To top this off, the Tablet Z uses a low performance ARM, which is nowhere near the same league as the Core i7 Sandy Bridge.
|
Okay, so you say we should compare ultrabooks to tablets, then say we shouldn't compare them with tablets?
make up your mind already.
Series 9 doesn't even have that good of a CPU , my laptop which is from 2011 has a i7 2.20 > 3.30 GHz , and its not even a high end PC, and it is 2k cheaper than the "Premium" Series 9 Samsung , Series 9 laptop has a 1.9 > 3.0 GHZ (that means when overclocked) , its slightly better than a CPU that you can find on a smartphone
It also supports full HD resolution which is by today should be a standard, while the series 9 sports a 1600 x 900
I could go on and on , but in short, that laptop is overpriced, but Samsung knows whos buying and people who buy it are the Galaxy fans with no computer knowledge, they are acting like Apple.