fordy said:
Turkish said:
fordy said:
Turkish said:
fordy said:
Turkish said:
fordy said:
Turkish said:
pezus said:
fordy said:
PullusPardus said:
fordy said:
Looks pretty clunky, especially when compared to today's slim ultrabooks. |
how is it clunky?
|
It looks tremendously thick compared to the Sandy Bridge architecture in ultrabooks. Take the Samsung Series 9 for example...
|
wat. How does it look thick?
|
Don't even bother, the Tablet Z is the thinnest 10" tablet, the guy obviously has an agenda as has is recent posts has shown, or he just has bad eyes.
|
Source?
By the way, there are ultrabooks thinner than this
|
It comes straight from the horse's mouth. Which ultrabook is thinner?
|
I already gave the Series 9 as an example, but I wouldn't be suprised if reports come back that Surface is thinner, since it seemed like the only tablet on the market who even came close to the Series 9 in terms of sleekness.
|
Samsung Series 9
12.3" (W) x 8.6" (H) x 0.50" (D)
Xperia Tablet Z:
10.47 x 6.77 x 0.27 inches
Please stop spreading bullshit misinformation.
|
How thick is the keyboard attachment? You're only using the screen dimensions.
To top this off, the Tablet Z uses a low performance ARM, which is nowhere near the same league as the Core i7 Sandy Bridge.
|
You said Series 9 was thinner, I proved you wrong, stop with the unnecessary bullshit.
|
You've proven nothing, since you haven't taken any kind of keyboard attachment into account. Should I just assume that you dont have said relevant data on the matter?
|
I try my best not to be rude but this pointless argument dragged on way too long. Why do you reply to me without knowing what you're talking about? I looked up the facts, I post them here, instead of questionning their validity why not look them up aswel? You are the one comparing an ultrabook with tablet and claiming the ultrabook is thinner, I put you in your place and proved you wrong.
I mean, why do you still have a presence in this thread after this? There is nothing to discuss anymore.
