Watch Dogs still looked like a really nice game, visually. The depth of field in the demo was something to behold.

Game looked gorgeous to me. Sure, Killzone has better graphics, but it didn't totally destroy Watchdogs, IMO. Watchdogs' sandbox looks to be more fun, anyway(imo). Besides, when visuals are THIS superb, does it really matter which game looks a little better?

That's why I wish it to be a PS360 version as next gen feat almost pulled on current consoles. It gets a fair treatment thereby and not like a 'diablo 3' on next-gen hardware.

As many have said watch dog is open world and also cross gen (ps3/360)...

It also looks perfect, so none of this matters!

I have no idea what Killzone you were watching.

Don't compare a linear game to an open world game, watch dogs is great blows away everything GTA5 has shown so far.

GTA IV covers the majority of California. That means larger than San Andreas backed up by tech a generation later.

WD looks alright. It's an open world, cross-generational game. It's bound to be one of the worst looking (technically) games of the console's life.

I don't know about that, but I do know they didn't look as good where it counts.

I dunno, i'm really not a fan of GTA for whatever reason but the whole controlling things with your phone seems like a really cool idea that I'd like to see explored more. Like the developer said everything is becoming "smart" nowadays and if someone manages to gain control, it'll be amazing what he or she can do.

Just the idea that a person can attain tremendous power and it's not totally unthinkable in the real world either.

Scanning someone with your phone from a distance, then using their pin at an ATM machine to get some money is pretty cool. Stopping a police squad car by popping up the road blocks and then stopping a train to get on and starting it to get away just seems like a lot of fun.

Graphically it looks pretty good too, but it's the gameplay and overall idea that makes it interesting for me.