By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - I'm scared about the PS4 price.

What do you define as acceptable?

My guess would be £299-349 for us. My reasoning: PS3 cost £425 at launch here and this is nowhere near as costly, PS3 will be should be less than half that price by the end of the year, and direct conversion puts these prices at $450 and $530 respectively, which sounds close to the cost of the system.



Around the Network

They will sell it at a loss, like most other console manufacturers will this gen, simply because they will make their money from games, game dlc, virtual store purchases, microtransactions, service subscriptions and premium content, also, adding 4gb of gddr5 only increases unit costs, for Sony, around $35-$44, people act like it somehow bumps the system up $200 or something.



Solid-Stark said:
A good guess would be $499 minimum. Start saving up.


This. As said on the other thread, they'd still take a small loss with that price. About $400 in parts not includng shipping, advetising or actually putting the thing together? It won't be ps3 expesive but it'll be close. They were better off with 4 gig. 4 gig dedicated to games is a hell of a difference to a pc with 4 gig of ram.



Trunkin said:
Sal.Paradise said:
PullusPardus said:
Sensei said:
Those are my thoughts as well.

That's 16 times the RAM of PS360, 4 times Wii U... and faster RAM!

I am excited and worried.


RAM cost about nothing, its cheaper than buying games nowadays

also @ OP 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=155504&page=1

This isn't the same RAM you're buying on Newegg...

The new $1000 Nvidia Titan GPU has 2gb less GDDR5 than the PS4..

Oh God...

BUT that has some beast GPU included... the GDDR5 is expensive, but only enough to bump the PS4 up maybe $50 in cost.



Solid-Stark said:
A good guess would be $499 minimum. Start saving up.

I would like to bet that we see a model cheaper than that at launch. 1 month sig control.



Around the Network

Assuming a $100 loss, a $400 console seems like a good estimate with a $500 "elite" version where they only lose around 50.

Could be even cheaper/less of a loss really. I mean you figure they get a raw parts discount, then factor in that 6 months from now these parts will be much lower in the PC tier then they are currently.



Sony gaming division cannot afford to take a loss on each console sold, unless the Vita suddenly starts shipping 100k+ a month. Its gonna be a pricey piece of hardware, and i think MS will try and undercut them on the price which could be a big downfall for Sony.



Current Game Machines: 3DS, Wii U, PC.

Currently Playing: X-Com(PC), Smash Bros(WiiU), Banner Saga(PC), Guild Wars 2(PC), Project X Zone(3DS), Luigis Mansion 2(3DS), DayZ(PC)

firelink said:
Sad thing is all of that RAM will go to waste.

GDDR RAM is designed to transfer large chunks of data like textures, frames, shaders, etc. This is why they are commonly used in video cards.

The thing no one tells you is that GDDR is awful when it comes to sequential R/W. This is why gaming PCs are built with GDDR for video cards and DDR for system memory. Your system memory has to swap around millions of variables constantly while running.

Go buy a cheap flash drive. It will do great transferring large files. Try transferring a large number of smaller files - the thread will lock up/slow down.

Nintendo and MS made the right choice with DDR3/eDRAM. You get the benefits of sequential R/W while getting a part of the benefit of high bandwidth. Using the right system RAM is essential today, when the way the OS works is just as important as the games.

Wow, that is a potential problem you are pointing out there.

Plus I've hear the rumors on the MS CPU will process two or four threads.  That will also make a more powerful CPU will it not?



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!

If the machine is expensive, i honestly think sony is fucked. The general consumers are not going to blow so much money on a console regardless of how the fantastic the games look. If microsoft can make a relatively powerful machine at an affordable price. I can see microsoft winning next gen with nintendo at a close second. Sony has to be incredibly careful with the pricing. Really it is make or break for them.



Bet with ninjablade:

Ninjablade wins if the next 5 multiplat on the wii u are inferior to the 360 version.

I win if one of the 5 mulitplats are on par or superior on the Wii U.

Andrespetmonkey said:
Trunkin said:
Sal.Paradise said:
PullusPardus said:
Sensei said:
Those are my thoughts as well.

That's 16 times the RAM of PS360, 4 times Wii U... and faster RAM!

I am excited and worried.


RAM cost about nothing, its cheaper than buying games nowadays

also @ OP 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=155504&page=1

This isn't the same RAM you're buying on Newegg...

The new $1000 Nvidia Titan GPU has 2gb less GDDR5 than the PS4..

Oh God...

BUT that has some beast GPU included... the GDDR5 is expensive, but only enough to bump the PS4 up maybe $50 in cost.

Not just some beast... more like THE beast.

Pretty much the pinacle of ridiculious PC overextravegence.

For a comparison, the PS3 GPU is supposed to have around 1.84 T.Flops.   The TItan more then doubles that.