By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - You people want MOAR Power in 8th Gen consoles, but........

Booyah on 10 February 2013
Turkish said:
Mazty said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:
Turkish said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Have you even read my comment? The min. viewing distance for 42" is 5ft(1.5m), for 65" 8ft (2.5m). Do you live in a container? 1m is insignificant.

If we used your logic, Americans should have 3x bigger tvs than English people because their houses are 3x bigger. I'd suggest you visit a retail chain next time and see what kind of tvs they're marketing.

This thread derailment is brought to you by the letter P and the number 4



Around the Network
Mazty on 10 February 2013
Turkish said:
Mazty said:

You notion is rediculous because you are ignoring all other factors. If we just go with what you are saying then in 2030 all TV's will be 200+".

Good one on completely ignoring the fact that I backed up my claim on finite living space. 
If the article is 5 years old then you need to find a more uptodate source. 

Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. 

Look at the bloody link I gave you. There isn't a market for big TV's because there isn't the room for them in Europe. Go look at an estate agent for the UK before talking about something you know absolutely nothing about. I've lived in both the US and UK and know the difference in housing size is phenomenal - you are just taking a complete guess at size. 


Have you even read my comment? The min. viewing distance for 42" is 5ft(1.5m), for 65" 8ft (2.5m). Do you live in a container? 1m is insignificant.

If we used your logic, Americans should have 3x bigger tvs than English people because their houses are 3x bigger. I'd suggest you visit a retail chain next time and see what kind of tvs they're marketing.


"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "

Clearly you didn't read my comment *facepalm*

So then why is the US market not buying big TVs if they have the room? Are you then saying that people just don't want big TVs? *facepalm x2*



Mnementh on 10 February 2013
MonstaMack said:
Well maybe EA can finally go under.
Granted I love Dead Space and Bioware games, It's kinda a necessary evil at this point for more companies to go under.

EA will survive thanks to yearly series like FIFA and Madden.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [GTA6]

Turkish on 10 February 2013
Mazty said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:

You notion is rediculous because you are ignoring all other factors. If we just go with what you are saying then in 2030 all TV's will be 200+".

Good one on completely ignoring the fact that I backed up my claim on finite living space. 
If the article is 5 years old then you need to find a more uptodate source. 

Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. 

Look at the bloody link I gave you. There isn't a market for big TV's because there isn't the room for them in Europe. Go look at an estate agent for the UK before talking about something you know absolutely nothing about. I've lived in both the US and UK and know the difference in housing size is phenomenal - you are just taking a complete guess at size. 


Have you even read my comment? The min. viewing distance for 42" is 5ft(1.5m), for 65" 8ft (2.5m). Do you live in a container? 1m is insignificant.

If we used your logic, Americans should have 3x bigger tvs than English people because their houses are 3x bigger. I'd suggest you visit a retail chain next time and see what kind of tvs they're marketing.


"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "

Clearly you didn't read my comment *facepalm*

So then why is the US market not buying big TVs if they have the room? Are you then saying that people just don't want big TVs? *facepalm x2*


Didn't understand anyhting what you just typed, but it sounds like you agreed with me. The min viewing distance difference for 42"-65" is just a meter, so unless you're living in a container, fitting a bigger screen in your room shouldn't be a problem.



Mazty on 10 February 2013
Turkish said:
Mazty said:

"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "

Clearly you didn't read my comment *facepalm*

So then why is the US market not buying big TVs if they have the room? Are you then saying that people just don't want big TVs? *facepalm x2*


Didn't understand anyhting what you just typed, but it sounds like you agreed with me. The min viewing distance difference for 42"-65" is just a meter, so unless you're living in a container, fitting a bigger screen in your room shouldn't be a problem.

For the third time. Yes, the THIRD TIME:

"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "



Around the Network
Turkish on 10 February 2013
Mazty said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:

"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "

Clearly you didn't read my comment *facepalm*

So then why is the US market not buying big TVs if they have the room? Are you then saying that people just don't want big TVs? *facepalm x2*


Didn't understand anyhting what you just typed, but it sounds like you agreed with me. The min viewing distance difference for 42"-65" is just a meter, so unless you're living in a container, fitting a bigger screen in your room shouldn't be a problem.

For the third time. Yes, the THIRD TIME:

"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "


Because comparing cinema front seats with tv screens make perfect sense smh.



Mazty on 10 February 2013
Turkish said:
Mazty said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:

"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "

Clearly you didn't read my comment *facepalm*

So then why is the US market not buying big TVs if they have the room? Are you then saying that people just don't want big TVs? *facepalm x2*


Didn't understand anyhting what you just typed, but it sounds like you agreed with me. The min viewing distance difference for 42"-65" is just a meter, so unless you're living in a container, fitting a bigger screen in your room shouldn't be a problem.

For the third time. Yes, the THIRD TIME:

"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "


Because comparing cinema front seats with tv screens make perfect sense smh.

a) It's good practice (done analysis before?) to use an average

b) People don't like being too close to large screens. Those mimimum distances would cut parts of the picture off. 

c) Once again, the rooms in Europe aren't big enough for large TV's. You are saying "just use the minimum distance" not factoring in that many people will most likely not like that distance as it is the minimum distance. 

Either way time will tell but I'm willing to bet big TV's won't take off here. 



Turkish on 10 February 2013
Mazty said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:

"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "

Clearly you didn't read my comment *facepalm*

So then why is the US market not buying big TVs if they have the room? Are you then saying that people just don't want big TVs? *facepalm x2*


Didn't understand anyhting what you just typed, but it sounds like you agreed with me. The min viewing distance difference for 42"-65" is just a meter, so unless you're living in a container, fitting a bigger screen in your room shouldn't be a problem.

For the third time. Yes, the THIRD TIME:

"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "


Because comparing cinema front seats with tv screens make perfect sense smh.

a) It's good practice (done analysis before?) to use an average

b) People don't like being too close to large screens. Those mimimum distances would cut parts of the picture off. 

c) Once again, the rooms in Europe aren't big enough for large TV's. You are saying "just use the minimum distance" not factoring in that many people will most likely not like that distance as it is the minimum distance. 

Either way time will tell but I'm willing to bet big TV's won't take off here. 


Not really, I sit around 2m from my 50" tv, I wish it was much bigger because it looks small.



brendude13 on 10 February 2013
Turkish said:
Mazty said:

a) It's good practice (done analysis before?) to use an average

b) People don't like being too close to large screens. Those mimimum distances would cut parts of the picture off. 

c) Once again, the rooms in Europe aren't big enough for large TV's. You are saying "just use the minimum distance" not factoring in that many people will most likely not like that distance as it is the minimum distance. 

Either way time will tell but I'm willing to bet big TV's won't take off here. 


Not really, I sit around 2m from my 50" tv, I wish it was much bigger because it looks small.

I don't agree with finding a 50" small at just 2m, but I do think that most people have a TV that is too small for the viewing distance.

Most people like to sit further back because their backlight is set far too high and it hurts their eyes.



Lafiel on 10 February 2013
brendude13 said:

I don't agree with finding a 50" small at just 2m, but I do think that most people have a TV that is too small for the viewing distance.

Most people like to sit further back because their backlight is set far too high and it hurts their eyes.

Yea, when my parents bought themselves a HDTV 2 years back they insisted on using 100% backlight setting, because "a professional set it up for them"... it was so bright that I could hardly look at it for more than 10 minutes.