Turkish said:
Mazty said:
Turkish said:
Mazty said:
"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "
Clearly you didn't read my comment *facepalm*
So then why is the US market not buying big TVs if they have the room? Are you then saying that people just don't want big TVs? *facepalm x2*
|
Didn't understand anyhting what you just typed, but it sounds like you agreed with me. The min viewing distance difference for 42"-65" is just a meter, so unless you're living in a container, fitting a bigger screen in your room shouldn't be a problem.
|
For the third time. Yes, the THIRD TIME:
"Yes because people always love sitting in the front seats at a cinema *facepalm* Working on the minimum distance is rediculous - average it out. "
|
Because comparing cinema front seats with tv screens make perfect sense smh.
|
a) It's good practice (done analysis before?) to use an average
b) People don't like being too close to large screens. Those mimimum distances would cut parts of the picture off.
c) Once again, the rooms in Europe aren't big enough for large TV's. You are saying "just use the minimum distance" not factoring in that many people will most likely not like that distance as it is the minimum distance.
Either way time will tell but I'm willing to bet big TV's won't take off here.
