ethomaz said:
I'm being realistics... the performance of the PS4 and Nextbox will surprise everyone here. |
We'll see, it would be nice for you to win vs me for once 

ethomaz said:
I'm being realistics... the performance of the PS4 and Nextbox will surprise everyone here. |
We'll see, it would be nice for you to win vs me for once 

| LilChicken22 said: “They’ll be able to put a lot more characters on the screen and allow for hyperrealistic games,” Pachter said. I don't think he's trying anymore. |
Stop hating and start playing.
Gribble said:
That is so naive. He's raising peoples expectations to a ridiculous level so that people will be disappointed. he sleeps with MS. |
I was making a joke, really.
There's a quote from Patcher about PS4 having hyper-realistic visuals. There's a non-quoted statement later on saying "processors cable of running games at 240fps".
The rest is just sensationalism and the information being taken the wrong way.
4 ≈ One
ethomaz said:
I'm being realistics... the performance of the PS4 and Nextbox will surprise everyone here. |
That is a possibility, but I suspect if that is the case their price will surprise you ... If Sony or Microsoft are willing to sell at $500 or $600 system they could probably produce a system that blows away most people's expectations, but they will also be producing systems that will struggle to sell.
Part of me hopes they go this route because after EA and several other gigantic publishers bet heavily on these systems, produce games that cost $100+ Million to make and only get a million sales, the collapse of large publishers will result in the environment where small talented developers can thrive again.
happydolphin said:
haha :) @S.T.A.G.E. At this point it appears he's an anti-Nintendo troll, that's what it looks like. He'll praise anything not Nintendo and bash Nintendo, always. It's sad. |
He was all for the Wii until its sales dropped. He liked the Wii but doesn't think the Wii U will have the same strength without casuals. I don't understand where thats so far fetched though.
| Chrizum said: 240 fps does not have any advantage over 60 fps whatsoever. |
More frames for subliminal advertising.
BuckStud said:
If the rumored specs are true, my 1 1/2 year old desktop is far more powerful.... and I cannot run the latest games on Ultra setting and achieve 240 FPS....This guy proves what little he knows ever time he opens his mouth.
I'm sure that he probably picked up a bunch of Sony stock dirt cheap and is trying to help inflate the value so he can unload it.
|
Sorry Missread the post, I thought " I cannot run the latest games on Ultra setting" was " I can run the latest games on Ultra setting"
Deyon said:
"Michael Patcher believes the Wii U is learning closer to the flop option, or as he put it, “it isn't going to work."Patcher believes the Wii only succeed due to luck and that this lucky streak won’t be continuing with the Wii U, since being novel won’t be to help Nintendo this time. But he does believe Nintendo fans and hardcore gamers will still buy the console.
He was right with that one. |
So he was wrong. The Wii was designed following one of the most influential and insightful business strategies of the late 20th century. It didn't succeed due to luck but great managerial effort and understanding of disruptive products. Pachter is so awesome... *cough*
I wonder what he will say about the 720.
480fps and realer than real graphics?
i think 240fps are possible,with few polygons.