platformmaster918 said: Every time I see someone say Sony will pass 360 soon it seems the counter point is "but Sony lost so much gen over gen. It took them too long. They lost their brand power. blah blah blah" This is completely irrelevant. If you're really happy with a close 3rd place then fine, but don't try to twist that into momentum, especially when it's been getting outsold for years. Facing a console with a $600 launch price, no system sellers in its first 2 years, a year late, and that was difficult to program for it's kind of pathetic that it's this close. People don't buy on brand names they buy on price, exclusives, and what their friends had. Price of course is partially effected by online fees and proprietary HDDs which people don't seem to see as much. It's just setting a pathetic standard for Xbox. You should shoot for 1st or at least 2nd, not brush off 3rd place like its something to be proud of. Have some pride in your console and demand better games and value! |
compared to a console with a 50% failure rate and its own lack of quality software early on? People talk about how the ps3 launched terribly as a reason why it is sad that the xbox isn't doing better, but they seem to forget that the xbox had a terrible launch themselves. In many ways, the 360's launch problems lasted longer than the ps3's problems.
Honestly, from a gamers perspective, every console maker was a winner this gen, there was no loser. People can debate arbitrary definitions of what it means for a console to be successful, but for gamers we all win this gen.