Boutros said:
Chandler said:
Boutros said:
Which is why companies with past glories are excluded (like Square Enix or Rareware).
|
Then Valve shouldn't be on this list either since DOTA, Team Fortress and Portal 2 are not really innovative and do not push any boundaries. Same goes for Bungie (past glories) and Riot games (milking their one big game, which isn't innovative at all).
|
DOTA 2 is really popular and is shaping the e-sport world (same thing for League of Legends for Riot games).
Valve keeps on releasing new amazing game and hasn't made a major mistake as a developer. The role Steam has on the increasing popularity of digital media and indie titles is noticable.
Bungie is working on something that looks great so far. They're still actual.
|
DOTA is still nothing special, it's just a me too game copying from Riot. Steam has nothing to do with Valve as a developer. Valves actuial game output is very sparse. Retro hasn't made a major mistake as a developer either, same goes for polyphony digital. Both companies are very probably working on something right now, so they are still relevant, either.
I just don't see any consistency in applying their citeria in this list, it's jumping all over the place.