He is just talking about 1 year, not entire lifetime.  It's like saying the PS2 has %99 of last generation next year because it is the only one that is being made still.

Ah, thanks^^

I was a bit confused by the OP

So where in that comment did I mention "spotted sales"? Tell me, where? You're telling me to stop pointing out at your assumptions, but you failed to simply notice the fact that I did not say "spotted sales." I will agree that my comment might have implied what you called "spotted sales," but no.... you had to harp that term over and over again. Here's another one: you kept claiming I don't give MSFT credit where it's due. Nowhere in any of my comments did I say the 360 was undeserving for its success, though I will admit my original comment might have implied that and sorry for the misunderstanding.

I will agree, my comment is harsh, but I'm just very skeptical of MSFT regarding next gen. MSFT can't just throw money here and there. The NextBox needs a lot more diverse game library. Kinect 2 should be more practical, not gimicky. From news that I've heard so far, I feel that MSFT hasn't really put in enough effort to do those things I'd like them to do. However....you start accusing me for being one of the Sony boys who blindly defend Sony no matter what the situation is....when I didn't even defend Sony in my original comment. smh This conversation could've been more civil, but you had to be immature in your original reply. "lmao, you're not even worth the debate." There were several other ways you could've replied in a more respectable way and yet, you went with....this. wth? I feel like we should just agree to disagree because this is getting ridiculous.. -_-

I'm not saying Xbox is a one hit wonder because their userbase has grown now and obviously something made by Microsoft wasn't going to stay down at 24 million forever, but they were spotted a TON of sales by Sony mistakes.  Without this gen's severe handicaps Sony will most likely lead them next gen.  The brand name is stronger as shown by the higher sales even though PS is STILL more expensive.  If it's the highest selling console despite being the most expensive the entire gen that may be the first time that's ever happened.

And you continue to defend your self.  You even admit you implied it.  As I said you aren't worth it and this conversation has went no where but you lieing and then defending a lie.  You made your mind up before I commented so their is no reason for me to even waste my time on you. Now as yuou said before, your not going to reply to me, so do me a favor and stop replying to me.

Both mistakes and things you do right defines you.  You act as if Sony has sold a lot more than MSFT and that is simply not true. They virtually sell the same, while sony has been outselling it lately but not by a lot either. And no Sony did not spot MSFT those sales.  X360 has more western games than Sony so most likely the NeXbox will stay dominate in the West next gen.  It hasn't been some fluke like you act like.  MSFT has proven to be a great competitor and has topped Sony in many ways.  What mistakes has sony made?  Releasing a $600 console?  Besides that what was a big mistake they've made.  No you just aren't giving credit where it is due.  Both MSFT and Sony has captured hardcore gamers but Kinect has been a success and XBL as well.  MSFT brought Achievements, a great online, and many others to this generation.  What has sony brought new?  MSFT has had a good business strategy and by you acting like they were some fluke and they don't deserve it makes you look bad.  Sony has done well with the PS3 but it lost a lot of market share to both Nintendo and MSFT, so instead of making excuses step up and realize that both Ninetendo and MSFT has done extremely well this generation.

You and others seem to think Sony is some dominate force like they use to be, but in present day it isn't.  MSFT and Sony will continue to compete next gen at a high level.

My whole point is MSFT was not spotted those sells, they earned them.

oh I see so a $400 PS3 released in 05 wouldn't have changed anything?  Got it.  I'll give Nintendo all the credit in the world.  They have earned their sales by offering a different experience and selling top notch games in underdevloped genres (in this day and age the platformer is one such genre especially 3d ones like Galaxy), but most 360 gamers I see buy COD and sports.  The only exclusive that really sells their system is Halo and to a certain extend Gears.  $600 wasn't the only mistake (although probably the biggest).  They were a year behind.  They offered none of their big franchises (GT, GoW, MGS, Uncharted) near launch.  All of these things would've resulted in death if Xbox had done it.  Instead of that fate, PS OUTSOLD the competition, which is an incredible feat considering they did SPOT MS all this stuff.  Even playing field in price and release=xbox dominated.  PS3 is still more expensive which means people are buying it for 1 of 2 things or both.  They are buying it for exclusives, or free online (PS+ is included in this value).  Selling more at the end of a generation indicates people are pleased with a system or word of mouth is better for that system.

And in the mean time X360 still makes more money and sells more software.  They didn't earn anything though, they weree created off of sony's mistakes alone, I get it.  Halo, Fable, forza, Left 4 Dead, and the countless other games including multiplatform and arcade games were all flukes created by sony's mistakes.  I understand now.

You are playing a what if game.  

Both mistakes and things you do right defines you.  You act as if Sony has sold a lot more than MSFT and that is simply not true. They virtually sell the same, while sony has been outselling it lately but not by a lot either. And no Sony did not spot MSFT those sales.  X360 has more western games than Sony so most likely the NeXbox will stay dominate in the West next gen.  It hasn't been some fluke like you act like.  MSFT has proven to be a great competitor and has topped Sony in many ways.  What mistakes has sony made?  Releasing a $600 console?  Besides that what was a big mistake they've made.  No you just aren't giving credit where it is due.  Both MSFT and Sony has captured hardcore gamers but Kinect has been a success and XBL as well.  MSFT brought Achievements, a great online, and many others to this generation.  What has sony brought new?  MSFT has had a good business strategy and by you acting like they were some fluke and they don't deserve it makes you look bad.  Sony has done well with the PS3 but it lost a lot of market share to both Nintendo and MSFT, so instead of making excuses step up and realize that both Ninetendo and MSFT has done extremely well this generation.

You and others seem to think Sony is some dominate force like they use to be, but in present day it isn't.  MSFT and Sony will continue to compete next gen at a high level.

My whole point is MSFT was not spotted those sells, they earned them.