MARCUSDJACKSON said:
|
Trust me on this one ;)
| happydolphin said: I'm not really a fan of the genre. I love dungeon crawlers like Diablo and Torchlight, but though I loved DMC when it first came out, I was later not able to get into it for some odd reason. I'm thinking you're a fan of Bayonetta? I know that the guys who made it put a lot of creativity into it, but I personally haven't played it really. Is it true that it was a respected game prior to the U ordeal? |
of course it was a respected game, and it still is. Far as I've seen the only person calling its quality into question in any way is Kyliedog, and I'd take a wild guess that his opinion is not based on the Wii U announcement. He dislikes lots of otherwise great things, he's kind of like machina in that way.
This is just another one of those arguments where someone tries to argue that a group is being hypocritical, but in reality only individuals can be hypocrits.
...
| happydolphin said: I'm not really a fan of the genre. I love dungeon crawlers like Diablo and Torchlight, but though I loved DMC when it first came out, I was later not able to get into it for some odd reason. I'm thinking you're a fan of Bayonetta? I know that the guys who made it put a lot of creativity into it, but I personally haven't played it really. Is it true that it was a respected game prior to the U ordeal? |
To get you interested in its sequel (you'll end up getting a Wii U...), the guys that worked in the first DMC (and didn't make any other DMC game) made Bayonetta.
happydolphin said:
I'm not really a fan of the genre. I love dungeon crawlers like Diablo and Torchlight, but though I loved DMC when it first came out, I was later not able to get into it for some odd reason. I'm thinking you're a fan of Bayonetta? I know that the guys who made it put a lot of creativity into it, but I personally haven't played it really. Is it true that it was a respected game prior to the U ordeal? |
well it's a niche game really i'd say,i probably got side tracked by something else but its not my usual type of game although i'll give anything a play,i did enjoy what i played,about half,the PS3 bayonetta got bashed if i remember correctly for this and that,i'd expect bayonetta to look pretty damn good and be kind of crazy,it's linear action fighting with bosses & collectables and a bar to shop & upgrade in,well it was
Above & Beyond
| KylieDog said: Tough question, has to be games that aren't very good and that nobody actually wants outside a select few but very loud internet people. Like Bayonetta was. |
You know, Vampire Hunter would be an awesome game to have, It would be really nice to see another one for sure!
happydolphin said:
Trust me on this one ;) |
flattery will get you nowhere.
| Torillian said:
of course it was a respected game, and it still is. Far as I've seen the only person calling its quality into question in any way is Kyliedog, and I'd take a wild guess that his opinion is not based on the Wii U announcement. He dislikes lots of otherwise great things, he's kind of like machina in that way. This is just another one of those arguments where someone tries to argue that a group is being hypocritical, but in reality only individuals can be hypocrits. |
Hypocrisy is a contagious thing, my dear Torillian. I have honestly never heard as much negative surrounding the prospect of a Bayo sequel than with this whole U thing. It's an observation, not a fact, so I'm just throwing it out there.
Having said that, I respect you giving the benefit of the doubt. It's something I'm still working on.
@Marcus. Flattery never was my forte.
| happydolphin said: Hypocrisy is a contagious thing, my dear Torillian. I have honestly never heard as much negative surrounding the prospect of a Bayo sequel than with this whole U thing. It's an observation, not a fact, so I'm just throwing it out there. Having said that, I respect you giving the benefit of the doubt. It's something I'm still working on. @Marcus. Flattery never was my forte. |
I don't view it as being about "benefit of the doubt" I view it as being about proof. You cannot prove a group to be hypocritical because they are not a hivemind. You can prove an individual to be a hypocrite if you find two contradictory statements from the same person, this doesn't work for a group.
...
| Torillian said:
I don't view it as being about "benefit of the doubt" I view it as being about proof. You cannot prove a group to be hypocritical because they are not a hivemind. You can prove an individual to be a hypocrite if you find two contradictory statements from the same person, this doesn't work for a group. |
Could you correlate, if a few members of a group post the same negativity of something, couldn't you say that there is a form of bias due to either jealousy or conflict of interest? It's a known fact that certain gamers get jealous when what was exclusive against a console becomes exclusive to a console. The reason? Well, fanboyism. We've seen it happen before. Not that it's a bad thing, some people just want their platform of choice to outperform another so they can have a better ecosystem, nothing to go to jail about.
I'm not saying that's what's happening here, I'm just saying my reasoning isn't far-fatched. Though they aren't a hive-mind, they may have common interests that conflict with an event, causing their sentiments to match.
Ok, then let me try...
A good game with decent sales but not huge so Nintendo can afford the exclusivity
Persona 5 comes to mind, great reviews decent but not great sales and not very Hardware demanding
Soulcalibur VI, last edition sold less than a million copies and it has brand recognition
No More Heroes 3, the first 2 came to the Wii so a third one is a no brainer this time in HD
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
