Not that I care about how they run but this is just trolling. Tecmo said apart from the cpu everything else is better then ps3 and 360. 3 years from now you'll be seeing stuff that blows that killzone e3 2005 trailer out the water. Since ps3 is capable of that trailer....... right?????? right??????

Jesting aside, you will be seeing stuff that just wasn't possible on microsoft and sony's current platforms.

Isn't this somewhat old news? One of the few things devs always criticize was the CPU (most of them said the speed was too slow), but praise it for other things. Besides if they can't get the game on the PS3 I really don't see the issue here..

The irony...

i think i need to book marks threads like these. that way in 2 years when thread after thread after thread emerge about the lack of 3rd parties games i can prove to you within days of release of the wiiU 3rd party support was pulling out.

i hope you guys enjoy your wiiU but please leave your sense of entitlement at the store.

That is very odd behavior.

you are a  sony fan***, i don't have anymore to say. have a good day :)

User has been banned for this post ~Barozi

Now it's: who cares we buy Nintendo consoles for Nintendo games
1 year from now it will be : why third parties don't support the Wii U wa!wa!wa!wa!wa

Translation: The Wii U has a different architecture from current-gen consoles which is less reliant on raw power provided by the CPU. We don't have the time or the funding to figure out how our programming needs to be adjusted to compensate for this difference, so a Wii U port is looking less and less likely.

It doesn't bother me that this is happening, but I wish they would just be honest about the situation instead of trying to blame in on Wii U's CPU.

I don't think anybody buys Nintendo consoles for 3rd party games lol

people who buy Nintendo consoles buy them for Nintendo games and its always been that way so nothing has changed!

First off, the Wii remote is hardly a thing of the past.  You know as well as I do that it's being prominently featured with WiiU - in fact they are going to have a whole new line of WiiU branded Wii remote plus'.  The main reason that it's not included with WiiU is because many people already have four of them and it would be silly to force extra units on consumers instead of letting them purchase them as needed.

It sounds like you believe that Nintendo should have continued to focus on motion gaming again, saying that the Wiimote/Nunchuk 2.0 should have been the standard.  While you're entitled to your opinion, that sounds an awful lot like the people who hated on the Wii because Nintendo chose a different direction.  The fact that the Gamepad direction could prove to be more beneficial to 3rd parties, however, is not an admission of catering to them, but instead, embracing traditional design in addition to new ideas.  In my opinion, there's nothing wrong with that.  It's not like 3rd parties invented the concept of traditional controls.

Regarding my 3DS analogy, look at it from the perspective of the original DS instead.  Should Nintendo have just made a touch-screen device sans buttons and d-pad, or included those elements, additionally catering to traditional design?  If they had gone with the former, would you have enjoyed NSMB as much?