i remember when lilbroex said graphics don't matter and "480p is enough for me", now everything is only about 1080p and how graphics are better than the other hd console graphics.

i mean, i love graphics so i understand if people love to talk about them and i hope wii u is as powerful as possible for that price but i simply can't understand how someone talks 90% of his time only about graphics who tried to tell us he doesn't care about graphics. even the biggest known graphic fans of this site talks more about other stuff percentual.

it's like i would love sport but would hate tennis and would only talk about tennis with other people and not about other sport.

480p is still enough for me.

The comments about the Wii U having better graphics are not a matter of my preference. They are for the specific purposes of proving the anti-Nintendo fanboys across the internet wrong and making them eat crow. Of couse they still ignore every move foward while focusing intently on every single piece of news that can even be slightly viewed as negative insisting on it being fact amongst other things. Its nice to see them squirm in butthurting agony from time to time, though.

As I told the last guy, I don't write these articles or release the news. I just post them. If it causes you pain to read it then take it up with the devs and journalists.

480p is still enough for me.

The comments about the Wii U having better graphics are not a matter of my preference. They are for the specific purposes of proving the anti-Nintendo fanboys across the internet wrong and making them eat crow. Of couse they still ignore every move foward while focusing intently on every single piece of news that can even be slightly viewed as negative insisting on it being fact amongst other things. Its nice to see them squirm in butthurting agony from time to time, though.

As I told the last guy, I don't write these articles or release the news. I just post them. If it causes you pain to read it then take it up with the devs and journalists.

the only feeling i get is that for you, everyone who doesn't love or praise everything from nintendo and maybe has something which he doesn't like is a anti-nintendo fanboy or biased, if gamer or journalist. those two words are almost in every thread of you.

Then you are getting only what you want to see.

Then you are getting only what you want to see.

Here's a nice report about the Wii-U version of the game. Just for you lilbroex: 

"Neko Entertainment has announced plans to port its PS3/Xbox 360/Vita puzzle action game Puddle to Wii U. The Wii U version features the HD graphics and 60 frames-per-second visuals of the console versions, with the tilt controls of the Vita version. "So basically it is the perfect compromise between the two important things in Puddle : graphics/physics and controls," Neko QA manager Sébastien Chipot-Delys said. The framerate is consistent even when playing fully on the GamePad."

http://www.joystiq.com/2012/10/12/puddle-spills-over-onto-wii-u/

Now, what will you accuse Joystiq of to make it all suit your agenda? Bad reporting? xD

I don't get what your trying to stay. When i read that line I interpret as they are the same. So what is it? Why is there so much argument over a poor game anyway? Puddle isn't in anyway shape or form a fun game.

 PS3 shots of the game can be found here. http://www.neoseeker.com/Games/Products/PS3/puddle/screens.html They look the same to me. But feel free to argue about it some more.

Even the vita version looks good. The only thing that stands out is a few jaggies in the photos that you don't see while the game is in motion.