Pro Choice, any time.
I've looked at the debate from a different perspective: I always thought that the opposite of pro-life is something equally extreme, pro-death. I think that every woman should have one mandatory abortion the first time they get pregnant. That way, the people that want to make other woman go through with their pregnancies can learn what it is to force them to do something they don't want to do.
In the same manner, I'm for mandatory interracial gay marriages when someone turns 18, followed by a mandatory divorce 1 year later. we should also give tax money to the cult of Osiris.
Pro Choice... all the way.
Pro-choice; I think scientific opinion currently shows that several-week-old foetuses are neither "babies" nor morally "human", while the emotional and physical distress many families would be in if abortions were outright banned is very real. Every situation is unique, and any attempt to ban it absolutely would be wrong for every party involved.
Ubuntu. Linux for human beings.
If you are interested in trying Ubuntu or Linux in general, PM me and I will answer your questions and help you install it if you wish.
| hibikir said: I've looked at the debate from a different perspective: I always thought that the opposite of pro-life is something equally extreme, pro-death. I think that every woman should have one mandatory abortion the first time they get pregnant. That way, the people that want to make other woman go through with their pregnancies can learn what it is to force them to do something they don't want to do. In the same manner, I'm for mandatory interracial gay marriages when someone turns 18, followed by a mandatory divorce 1 year later. we should also give tax money to the cult of Osiris. |
you want to be my friend? And I mean in the not mandatory interracial gay marriage type of way.
Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.
The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.
All you peple are saying that foetus aren't human but it is alive... And the horrible methods used by people when it was illegal hasn't changed much from now that it is legal. My friend told me they use some kind of vaccum and suck it out, then they "scrub" the rest of the stuff... I have trouble saying that, because I'm so pertubed. I AM A GIRL and I wouldn't do this... Exept if my life is in danger.
If anyone is strong enough to see this, here's an 8 week abortion, don't you think it ressembles humans?
http://www.abort73.com/HTML/AbortionPictures/images/abortion-08-01.jpg
| Bodhesatva said: Here's a simple scenario to highlight my above point: if science or some religion were to prove, without any doubt, that two day old embryo's were capable of understanding and feeling pain the way a month old new born is -- or, if you'd prefer, were able to "prove" the existance of souls to us beyond a shadow of a doubt, and then prove that these embryos had souls -- would any of us still be pro-choice? I'd bet the answer is no, because that is unambiguously, unequivocably murder. However, no religion has really "proved" to me (or many others) that souls exist, and science certainly doesn't support the notion that early embryonic fetuses are capable of cognition or any real semblance of pain. Therefore, I am pro-choice, because the evidence I see does not support the notion that early embryos are "human" in the manner in which I define that term. |
Don't know about proving at two days, but there is ultrasounds of abortions at 11 weeks that prove such a young infant is capable of feeling pain.
Does this switch you from being a 6 month pro-choice to a 3 month pro-choice?
It is rediculous, but right now it is legal in America for abortions in the 9th month.
| lolita said: All you peple are saying that foetus aren't human but it is alive... And the horrible methods used by people when it was illegal hasn't changed much from now that it is legal. My friend told me they use some kind of vaccum and suck it out, then they "scrub" the rest of the stuff... I have trouble saying that, because I'm so pertubed. I AM A GIRL and I wouldn't do this... Exept if my life is in danger. If anyone is strong enough to see this, here's an 8 week abortion, don't you think it ressembles humans? http://www.abort73.com/HTML/AbortionPictures/images/abortion-08-01.jpg |
Well, then choose yourself. You made the choice. What right do you have to tell another woman what she has to do?
Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.
The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.
| Kasz216 said: I don't get people with rape provisons or medical provisions. It's ok to kill someone just cause someone got raped. Someone not related at all with the rape? By doing that you are basically admitting that the "Child's" life is worth less then the mothers. It is, more or less, not human. The same can be said for any abortion really. Even to save a mothers life. You are killing one human to save another. That kind of thing is usually frowned opon. Even if two people are dying... one slowly with a good heart, and another fast. You can't kill the slowly dying man to give the heart to the one that will die sooner. It's unethical. As would performing an abortion to save the mothers life if you treat said baby as real person. Even if there is a less then 50% chance of saving them both. Either your Pro-Life or not. You can't have magical circumstances where the "baby" is no longer a person. If you make provisions where you can abort the baby, you are making it not human, or at the very least... less human... thereby defeating your entire arguement in the first place. |
It's called compromise. If the choice is 126,000 (world wide abortions per day), or compromising to bring it down to 1,000 per day so that pro-abortion people can't use rare extreme cases to further their agenda, as 100% pro-life isn't going to happen any time soon and would just mean illegal abortions.
It is just sick how abortions are used as a form of casual birth control.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
