| Bodhesatva said: Here's a simple scenario to highlight my above point: if science or some religion were to prove, without any doubt, that two day old embryo's were capable of understanding and feeling pain the way a month old new born is -- or, if you'd prefer, were able to "prove" the existance of souls to us beyond a shadow of a doubt, and then prove that these embryos had souls -- would any of us still be pro-choice? I'd bet the answer is no, because that is unambiguously, unequivocably murder. However, no religion has really "proved" to me (or many others) that souls exist, and science certainly doesn't support the notion that early embryonic fetuses are capable of cognition or any real semblance of pain. Therefore, I am pro-choice, because the evidence I see does not support the notion that early embryos are "human" in the manner in which I define that term. |
Don't know about proving at two days, but there is ultrasounds of abortions at 11 weeks that prove such a young infant is capable of feeling pain.
Does this switch you from being a 6 month pro-choice to a 3 month pro-choice?
It is rediculous, but right now it is legal in America for abortions in the 9th month.
