| Kasz216 said: I don't get people with rape provisons or medical provisions. It's ok to kill someone just cause someone got raped. Someone not related at all with the rape? By doing that you are basically admitting that the "Child's" life is worth less then the mothers. It is, more or less, not human. The same can be said for any abortion really. Even to save a mothers life. You are killing one human to save another. That kind of thing is usually frowned opon. Even if two people are dying... one slowly with a good heart, and another fast. You can't kill the slowly dying man to give the heart to the one that will die sooner. It's unethical. As would performing an abortion to save the mothers life if you treat said baby as real person. Even if there is a less then 50% chance of saving them both. Either your Pro-Life or not. You can't have magical circumstances where the "baby" is no longer a person. If you make provisions where you can abort the baby, you are making it not human, or at the very least... less human... thereby defeating your entire arguement in the first place. |
It's called compromise. If the choice is 126,000 (world wide abortions per day), or compromising to bring it down to 1,000 per day so that pro-abortion people can't use rare extreme cases to further their agenda, as 100% pro-life isn't going to happen any time soon and would just mean illegal abortions.
It is just sick how abortions are used as a form of casual birth control.
