By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Bethesda wary of Wii U: ‘it doesn’t support our games’

Viper1 said:
richardhutnik said:

So you going to boycott all website articles except company press releases than only announce the products of the company?

Or I'll just ignore all but what I write myself.

 

But that's extreme.    My preference would be for us all to ignore all sites that write for hits rather than write to inform.

Maybe we should enforce quality in our threads, and choose articles of quality. And if they are not, we would post them with a "my thoughts on this article" segment at the top or bottom of the article quote.

And we could also state the source, but not hyperlink it! Also, we could paraphrase the article instead of  copying it altogether.



Around the Network
Viper1 said:
twesterm said:
KungKras said:
twesterm said:
melbye said:
Ugh, third parties never have a backbone when it comes to Nintendo-consoles. Always the wait and see approach and when they are ready to make games for it, it is already too late.


Can you blame them?

Making a AAA game is a huge risk with often little payoff.  Add onto that the fact that third party core games that aren't Nintendo properties typically don't sell well on Nintendo consoles.

Except for Resident Evil 4, Epic Mickey, House of the Dead Overkill, Sonic Colours, and you know, the games that actually appeared on the system that doesn't make it feel like you're getting a second rate deal compared to the other consoles.

Riiiiight because I forgot those were the only big budget and/or high profile games on the system.  Silly me!

The production effort and the advertising effort of Wii 3rd party games versus X360/PS3 games is probably a bigger gulf than the technological differences between the consoles.

damn thats big but probably true



happydolphin said:
Viper1 said:
richardhutnik said:

So you going to boycott all website articles except company press releases than only announce the products of the company?

Or I'll just ignore all but what I write myself.

 

But that's extreme.    My preference would be for us all to ignore all sites that write for hits rather than write to inform.

Maybe we should enforce quality in our threads, and choose articles of quality. And if they are not, we would post them with a "my thoughts on this article" segment at the top or bottom of the article quote.

And we could also state the source, but not hyperlink it! Also, we could paraphrase the article instead of  copying it altogether.

This is an idea i can get behind, whats funny is the same people who complain about bad articles, will be the ones who will make a thread about them, hell VGchartz is the only reason i know of the bad ones



Only 3 things are a constant in the universe - death, taxes, and third parties snubbing Nintendo consoles



The guy is just confused as to why his games that he bought for the Xbox 360 don't work when you put them into the Wii U and try to play them.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.