Adinnieken said:
No. |
"Different than" suggests there are 3 items being referred to e.g "Apples are more different than Oranges to tangerines". But in the example I gave, only 2 items are being compared, "than" is incorrect.
Adinnieken said:
No. |
"Different than" suggests there are 3 items being referred to e.g "Apples are more different than Oranges to tangerines". But in the example I gave, only 2 items are being compared, "than" is incorrect.
Only in Fanboy Land, where Actors are thought to be exclusive rather than working for the highest bidder like assassins or mercenaries. Am I the only one who sees the Playstation as Nintendo? Nintendo birthed the Playstation but tried to abort it and we all (gamers...i.e Xbox, wii, ps) forever benefited from that division.
Just because you chose to quote a famous dead person does not mean that you are some type of intellect nor does it mean that the quote in question is correct.
Ajescent said:
"Different than" suggests there are 3 items being referred to e.g "Apples are more different than Oranges to tangerines". But in the example I gave, only 2 items are being compared, "than" is incorrect. |
I'm telling you, "than" is an accepted form. Type "Different from, Different to, Different than" in Google or Bing and you'll find a topic that actually covers this.
http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/adjectives-adverbs/different-from-vs-different-than/
http://www.dailywritingtips.com/different-from-different-to-different-than/
Than = compared to
Thus "An apple is different compared to an orange." or "An apple is different than an orange."
EDIT: Links added
I'm not saying it's a preferred use, I'm just saying it is an accepted use.
Adinnieken said:
I'm telling you, "than" is an accepted form. Type "Different from, Different to, Different than" in Google or Bing and you'll find a topic that actually covers this. |
http://www.dailywritingtips.com/different-from-different-to-different-than/
It would seem, then, that any of the three is acceptable.
Nevertheless, the concluding advice at Bartleby.com agrees with my own:
…for Formal and Oratorical levels: stick with different from.
I think I'll stick to my way.
Rafux said: They have taken everything from us, is there nothing sacred anymore? |
Taken? Sony likely disposed of him, and Bridgestone was eager to get their hands on a VP of everything and make him do research.
kowenicki said:
|
The Amen is to what? Was it for the correction of something I linked to? I hope so, because in what I wrote, there were a number of verbs: do, wonder, was, going, make, is, am. None of these are the word "of".
klumminati said: Only in Fanboy Land, where Actors are thought to be exclusive rather than working for the highest bidder like assassins or mercenaries. Am I the only one who sees the Playstation as Nintendo? Nintendo birthed the Playstation but tried to abort it and we all (gamers...i.e Xbox, wii, ps) forever benefited from that division. |
In the world of mercenaries, the mercenaries are seen as disposable. Contractors are pawns released the moment companies no longer need them. I believe this then leads to why mascots are usually created by companies, so they never let them go, and never have to pay them. When you employ a Kevin Butler character, and then decide to let the actor go, it gets ackward.
Heck, I am wondering what happened to Ugoff, on another note.
richardhutnik said: The Amen is to what? Was it for the correction of something I linked to? I hope so, because in what I wrote, there were a number of verbs: do, wonder, was, going, make, is, am. None of these are the word "of". |
It's "must have." Or "must've" if you're being colloquial, and which sounds like "must of" but is not.
pezus said:
" Sony must of been done with the whole Kevin Butler campaign " "Sony must of felt they could also keep the character" |
http://grammarist.com/usage/must-of/