By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Man has not eaten or drank liquids for 70 years

haxxiy said:
Soleron said:
He should take the Randi challenge and earn himself a million dollars.


In the small chance this guy is for real they'd argue there is a chance he's being fed by vacuum energy and tiny wormholes. Nothing supernatural, no money


There haven't been any close cases in the history of the challenge. The vast majority have backed out before it comes to a test, and none of the tests have come close to a positive read. Even just beating the challenge condition would be worth a million to any real psychic because of the associated publicity, so the lack of winning isn't due to a belief that they wouldn't pay out.



Around the Network
WiiBox3 said:
Crack is a hell of a drug.

Russians have krokodils, Unites States have bath salts, BasilZero have a gajillion games he actually plays. Indians have superpowers, confirmed.



Obviously he has to you would die if didnt have water. Food you can somewhat get away with not eating. Water no way, you get dehydrated and die it's that simple. He has to injest some kind of water or your dead period, I think it's 2 or 3 weeks with out food you die And 2 weeks without water and your dead.



Sure solves alot of hunger/food/water problems on this planet.



Soleron said:
haxxiy said:
Soleron said:
He should take the Randi challenge and earn himself a million dollars.


In the small chance this guy is for real they'd argue there is a chance he's being fed by vacuum energy and tiny wormholes. Nothing supernatural, no money


There haven't been any close cases in the history of the challenge. The vast majority have backed out before it comes to a test, and none of the tests have come close to a positive read. Even just beating the challenge condition would be worth a million to any real psychic because of the associated publicity, so the lack of winning isn't due to a belief that they wouldn't pay out.

Believe me, no one would part on money (and pride) so easily.  One of the clauses state he isn't obliged to pay anything even if the conditions are met, and there's always room for arguing something. Hell I could start today a one-million dollar challenge to be proved men landed on the moon, or that relativity exists beyond a doubt, and always crawl my way out of any evidence. The thing is, my little challenge will never prove anything. What right do I have to disconsider every outsider research as the fruit of deluded people working for an agenda? Or call them morons who don't get they are a bunch of liars because they can't come in front of me and prove what they are saying?

I'm not here to say psychic powers exist or not. Or that guy really didn't eat anything for 70 years. But hell, I'm open to the possibility that might be something out there our measly 150 years of physics and biology still can't accurately explain. The thing is, would it really matter? Would it change something on your daily life? How? Where? Why? 



 

 

 

 

 

Around the Network
haxxiy said:
Soleron said:
haxxiy said:
Soleron said:
He should take the Randi challenge and earn himself a million dollars.


In the small chance this guy is for real they'd argue there is a chance he's being fed by vacuum energy and tiny wormholes. Nothing supernatural, no money


There haven't been any close cases in the history of the challenge. The vast majority have backed out before it comes to a test, and none of the tests have come close to a positive read. Even just beating the challenge condition would be worth a million to any real psychic because of the associated publicity, so the lack of winning isn't due to a belief that they wouldn't pay out.

Believe me, no one would part on money (and pride) so easily.  One of the clauses state he isn't obliged to pay anything even if the conditions are met, and there's always room for arguing something. Hell I could start today a one-million dollar challenge to be proved men landed on the moon, or that relativity exists beyond a doubt, and always crawl my way out of any evidence. The thing is, my little challenge will never prove anything. What right do I have to disconsider every outsider research as the fruit of deluded people working for an agenda? Or call them morons who don't get they are a bunch of liars because they can't come in front of me and prove what they are saying?

I'm not here to say psychic powers exist or not. Or that guy really didn't eat anything for 70 years. But hell, I'm open to the possibility that might be something out there our measly 150 years of physics and biology still can't accurately explain. The thing is, would it really matter? Would it change something on your daily life? How? Where? Why? 


So what defines a psychic to you?



its all about meditation ,practice and saving energy.



Tsubasa Ozora

Keiner kann ihn bremsen, keiner macht ihm was vor. Immer der richtige Schuss, immer zur richtigen Zeit. Superfussball, Fairer Fussball. Er ist unser Torschützenkönig und Held.

He might not "eat". If he has made it this long with out eating he probably get his nourishment some other way. There are probably ways to get food to inject directly into the blood stream. But this is story smells a lot like a farm because it looks like it's covered in BS.



Soleron said:
He should take the Randi challenge and earn himself a million dollars.

I know you are likely not being serious, but there are actually good reasons the JREF will not test claims like this. Here is a quote from one of their members:

"We've been around this issue before. Does Mr. Randi have a reasonable basis for giving such "claims" short shrift? You bet he does.

First, the claim is inherently hazardous. It is well-known that human beings can go without food for extended periods of time, and there is nothing supernatural, paranormal or occult about that. Extended periods of starvation, however, are known to be harmful to health, and it is unreasonable to expect a claim to be tested that puts the claimant's health at such risk. Mr. Randi does not test individuals who claim, for example, to be impervious to bullets, and with good reason: such a test would be inherently hazardous to the claimant, regardless of the claimant's sincerity and willingness to be tested.

Second, the claim in question requires an extensive amount of time and is expensive to control. The individual in question must be monitored continually for weeks, if not months.

Which is related to the third point, namely, such claims are rife with fraud. Past tests of such claims have shown a propensity on the part of claimants to sneak food when they thought they were not being observed. These were not a mere mistaken beliefs or honest self-delusions on the part of the claimants; rather, they were deliberate attempts to cheat.

In the absence of a compelling reason, there is no reason to undertake the time and expense needed to test such a claim."



"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever." - Spinal Tap

I just ate a very amazing sand witch, why would anyone not want the pleasure, the SIN to enjoy gluttony....yum yum