There is no such thing as 100% gay though, everyone is bisexual to one degree or another. That's my PoV on it, and I'd be hard-pressed to be proven otherwise.

We know from science that a person is developed in the womb and in a certain phase of that fetal development they are bathing in a mixture of hormones which highly determine his sexual make-up, early on. It would be my understanding then that no-one is 100% homo or 100% hetero, but a degree therein.

@bold. imho it all makes sense, as he is mostly anti-religious in general. Circumcision is just one other traditional practice to bombard with religious intolerance. It's how I understand it.

Well, now you have your answer, see my reply to him.

Yeah, really. If you are posting on VGChartz, it is safe to assume that you are no intellectual.

I can't tell if you were being sarcastic, but that's exactly it, :P.

I think satirical would be the word, you non-intellect you!

I have never been more serious in my entire life.

Bravo, good sir. Bravo.

That is the prevailing psychological opinion. It is believed that we each have certain degrees of bisexuality because it helps us sympathize with the other sex (to take a stereotypical example, metrosexual men having increased chick appeal over some crotch-scratching slob), so perhaps *actual* bisexuality (where that degree if sympathy is near 50%) or homosexuality are imbalances in that tendency.

I have know idea what the op said because the post has been deleted. But I do want to comment on "intellectuals" and how they treat others.

In my opinion people who consider themselves to be intellectual often are no more well educated than your average college graduate. Unlike the average grad they do tend to hold onto "facts" as though they were precious heirlooms. Like an old collector they like to show off their heirlooms as often as possible to prove their value. And just like that old collect when they feel threatened they will throw those heirlooms at their "attacker' and try to beat them to death with them.

Now you may have noticed that a few lines back I but the word "facts" in quotes. Intellectuals love facts, but they only care about the ones that fit into their ideas. So they read up on data, no matter how unsupported, that agrees with their perceptions. For an "intellectual" the only thing more important than being right is making others agree with them. The only thing they find more offensive than differing opinions is valid counter data and facts.

Real intellectuals work at universities or other research sectors. Anyone who considers them self an intellectual, but doesn't get paid for their abundant intellect is probably just an egomaniacal megalomaniac with a subconscious inferiority complex.

You might be saying, hey those a pretty big words, maybe you think you are an intellectual. Nope, I'm just an average guy who double checked the word "megalomaniac" on dictionary.com because I know I make mistakes sometimes. Intellectuals with argue an opinion as fact until the next ice age. The average person, like me and most of the people reading this, like to preface their opinions with "in my opinion" and will happily go on living life knowing that others don't share that opinion.