By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Wii U Can Do “1080p Without Breaking A Sweat”

Hynad on 09 August 2012
lilbroex said:
Hynad said:

You can't be serious.  People don't fail to understand you. You fail to word your sentences in a manner in which it can be understood the way you supposedly want them to be.

You said this earlier:  "They can [make NSMBU and NintendoLand get 1080p]. Nintendo chose not too for their own titles as it would be added cost with no benefit. All first party will be running at 1080p natively however."

Which means, for those who have basic understanding of grammar: Nintendo Can make those 2 first party titles (NSMBU and NintendoLand) run in 1080p but they chose not to because it would cost them too much for no real benefit.  But they will run at 1080p.

How is that even logical?

But you don't stop there:  "Arkham City: Armored Edtion runs at 1080p 60fps on both the tv and controller"

That phrasing doesn't mean anything other than the game will run in 1080p on the TV and in 1080p on the controller.


Lrn 2 txt. =P


There were no flaw in the words of why Nintendo is not making their releases games 1080. I didn't think there needed any epxlaination on this because Reggie said it himself.

But that isn't what you said. You said Nintendo's first party games won't be in 1080p, but they will be in 1080p...

Now, if you want to say someone said something, or you saw something, or that you heard your cousin's step sister's uncle's father-in-law's grand father talk about it.... quote and link them.

That will save you lots of trouble and misunderstanding.



Around the Network
lilbroex on 09 August 2012
Hynad said:
lilbroex said:
Hynad said:

You can't be serious.  People don't fail to understand you. You fail to word your sentences in a manner in which it can be understood the way you supposedly want them to be.

You said this earlier:  "They can [make NSMBU and NintendoLand get 1080p]. Nintendo chose not too for their own titles as it would be added cost with no benefit. All first party will be running at 1080p natively however."

Which means, for those who have basic understanding of grammar: Nintendo Can make those 2 first party titles (NSMBU and NintendoLand) run in 1080p but they chose not to because it would cost them too much for no real benefit.  But they will run at 1080p.

How is that even logical?

But you don't stop there:  "Arkham City: Armored Edtion runs at 1080p 60fps on both the tv and controller"

That phrasing doesn't mean anything other than the game will run in 1080p on the TV and in 1080p on the controller.


Lrn 2 txt. =P


There were no flaw in the words of why Nintendo is not making their releases games 1080. I didn't think there needed any epxlaination on this because Reggie said it himself.

But that isn't what you said. You said Nintendo's first party games won't be in 1080p, but they will be in 1080p...

Now, if you want to say someone said something, or you saw something, or that you heard your cousin's step sister's uncle's father-in-law's grand father talk about it.... quote and link them.

That will save you lots of trouble and misunderstanding.


Yes. They won't be(present tense) in 1080p. They will be (future tense) in 1080p. There is nothing grammaticaly wrong with that. That is what Reggie stated, that is what I'm stating.

I've already posted the links and news long ago. Go search the forum or somewhere else if you want to know. I'm not reposting it or anything else.

I will save myself trouble and misunderstanding by ceasing to argue with all of you who come here for no other purpose than to dismiss any gains/sucess afforded Nintendo and make conflict where there need be none. You can keep begging as long as you want. If you really wanted to know that badly, you have the internet.



Hynad on 09 August 2012
lilbroex said:
Hynad said:
lilbroex said:
Hynad said:

You can't be serious.  People don't fail to understand you. You fail to word your sentences in a manner in which it can be understood the way you supposedly want them to be.

You said this earlier:  "They can [make NSMBU and NintendoLand get 1080p]. Nintendo chose not too for their own titles as it would be added cost with no benefit. All first party will be running at 1080p natively however."

Which means, for those who have basic understanding of grammar: Nintendo Can make those 2 first party titles (NSMBU and NintendoLand) run in 1080p but they chose not to because it would cost them too much for no real benefit.  But they will run at 1080p.

How is that even logical?

But you don't stop there:  "Arkham City: Armored Edtion runs at 1080p 60fps on both the tv and controller"

That phrasing doesn't mean anything other than the game will run in 1080p on the TV and in 1080p on the controller.


Lrn 2 txt. =P


There were no flaw in the words of why Nintendo is not making their releases games 1080. I didn't think there needed any epxlaination on this because Reggie said it himself.

But that isn't what you said. You said Nintendo's first party games won't be in 1080p, but they will be in 1080p...

Now, if you want to say someone said something, or you saw something, or that you heard your cousin's step sister's uncle's father-in-law's grand father talk about it.... quote and link them.

That will save you lots of trouble and misunderstanding.


Yes. They won't be(present tense) in 1080p. They will be (future tense) in 1080p. There is nothing grammaticaly wrong with that. That is what Reggie stated, that is what I'm stating.

I've already posted the links and news long ago. Go search the forum or somewhere else if you want to know. I'm not reposting it or anything else.

I will save myself trouble and misunderstanding by ceasing to argue with all of you who come here for no other purpose than to dismiss any gains/sucess afforded Nintendo and make conflict where there need be none. You can keep begging as long as you want. If you really wanted to know that badly, you have the internet.


You sure have one of the "greatest" way to discuss things I've ever seen on VGC.

And just so you know, I'm not here to crap all over Nintendo.  I Love them very much, they give me plenty of great gaming moments and I can't wait for them to announce the next Metroid.  Also, I'm getting the Wii U at launch... so... yeah.

Doesn't mean I will sit idly while reading your erroneous comments.



crissindahouse on 09 August 2012

@lilbro

you just posted too many false things in the past, that's maybe the problem why few people don't believe everything you say.



lilbroex on 09 August 2012
crissindahouse said:

@lilbro

you just posted too many false things in the past, that's maybe the problem why few people don't believe everything you say.


No, I haven't.

Over 90% of what I post are news articles that are copied and pasted 100%. The rest was usually reposting those articles or info from them in pointless debates like this one for people who didn't even bother to read them because their only real purpose was to troll any and all positive news about Nintendo.



Around the Network
BlkPaladin on 09 August 2012

They promised 1080p but the last I saw they haven't got it pinned down yet. That was last month.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=39109

They still have another month or so to go gold so a lot of development can happen in that time peroid.



crissindahouse on 09 August 2012
lilbroex said:
crissindahouse said:

@lilbro

you just posted too many false things in the past, that's maybe the problem why few people don't believe everything you say.


No, I haven't.

Over 90% of what I post are news articles that are copied and pasted 100%. The rest was usually reposting those articles or info from them in pointless debates like this one for people who didn't even bother to read them because their only real purpose was to troll any and all positive news about Nintendo.

as example you once said battlefield 3 didn't impress you graphically on pc and it is only a crappy console port. if this isn't false what is it?

you said in this thread arkham city will be in 1080p with 60 fps but even when people search for it and don't find the 60 fps confirmation you say to them they shall search by themselve

you started a thread about trine 2 and how awesome it looks on wii u compared to ps3 using some pics of a site who had pc screens and never claimed that these are trine 2 pictures of the wii u version (but i believe wii u version will look like the pc version if it comes to the bigger differences). people believed that over some sites then.



green_sky on 09 August 2012

Well good to know that it won't be making the room all wet and moist with sweat.



lilbroex on 09 August 2012
crissindahouse said:
lilbroex said:
crissindahouse said:

@lilbro

you just posted too many false things in the past, that's maybe the problem why few people don't believe everything you say.


No, I haven't.

Over 90% of what I post are news articles that are copied and pasted 100%. The rest was usually reposting those articles or info from them in pointless debates like this one for people who didn't even bother to read them because their only real purpose was to troll any and all positive news about Nintendo.

as example you once said battlefield 3 didn't impress you graphically on pc and it is only a crappy console port. if this isn't false what is it?

you said in this thread arkham city will be in 1080p with 60 fps but even when people search for it and don't find the 60 fps confirmation you say to them they shall search by themselve

you started a thread about trine 2 and how awesome it looks using some pics of a site who had pc screens and never claimed that these are trine 2 pictures of the wii u version (but i believe wii u version will look like the pc version if it comes to the bigger differences). people believed that over some sites then.


Nothing is false about that. Even though Battlefiled 3 was made with the PC as its main system it was made to scale for the console. It was nerfed for them to make it easily portable like Sonic Unleashed on the Wii was nerfed for the PS2 version, so as far as I am concerened its the same as any othe rconsole port to the PC.

Both Arkham City and Assasin's Creed run at 1080p, 60fps natively. This was confirmed. I do not see why no one can find it. The Assassin's Creed comparision I visually confirmed myself.

What are you getting at with the Trine 2 screens? The dev released them as the Wii U screnshots and I copied and pasted them and the news 100%. Later examinations "made by myself" of some PC screens that another posted put out for comparison made it clear that they were just scaled down PC screenshots. (to be below the resolution of the regular Wii). I was the one who said they weren't what the devs claimed to be. That was the fault of the people who wrote the news. I only reposted it.

Took me all of 2 seconds to pull this up in google.

http://www.gamingvlog.net/2012/06/09/nintendo-explains-why-some-wii-u-launch-titles-will-be-720p/

And I am done. You can beg and pick at it to your hearts content. I'm tired of this.



crissindahouse on 09 August 2012
lilbroex said:
crissindahouse said:
lilbroex said:
crissindahouse said:

@lilbro

you just posted too many false things in the past, that's maybe the problem why few people don't believe everything you say.


No, I haven't.

Over 90% of what I post are news articles that are copied and pasted 100%. The rest was usually reposting those articles or info from them in pointless debates like this one for people who didn't even bother to read them because their only real purpose was to troll any and all positive news about Nintendo.

as example you once said battlefield 3 didn't impress you graphically on pc and it is only a crappy console port. if this isn't false what is it?

you said in this thread arkham city will be in 1080p with 60 fps but even when people search for it and don't find the 60 fps confirmation you say to them they shall search by themselve

you started a thread about trine 2 and how awesome it looks using some pics of a site who had pc screens and never claimed that these are trine 2 pictures of the wii u version (but i believe wii u version will look like the pc version if it comes to the bigger differences). people believed that over some sites then.


Nothing is false about that. Even though battlefiled 3 ws made with the PC as its mainsystem it was made to scale for the console. It was nerfed for them, so as far as I am concerened its the same as any othe rconsole port to the PC.

Both Arkham City and Assasin's Creed run at 1080p, 60fps natively. This was confirmed. I do not see why no one can find it.

What are you getting at with the Trine 2 screens? The dev released them as the Wii U screnshots and I copied and pasted them 100%. Later examinations made by "myself made it clear that they were just scaled down PC screenshots. (to be below the resolution of the regular Wii). I was the one who said they weren't what the devs claimed to be. That was the fault of the people who wrote the news. I only reposted it.

Took me all of 2 seconds to pull this up in google.

http://www.gamingvlog.net/2012/06/09/nintendo-explains-why-some-wii-u-launch-titles-will-be-720p/

And I am done. You can beg and pick at it to your hearts content. I'm tired of this.

1. you did never play battlefield 3 on ultra on a 1080p screen with hbao and bla then if you really believe that.

2. don't know but i also don't find that about batman.

3. i was posting it in your trine 2 thread and said that it isn't the wii u version you posted and now you say that your examinations made it clear it weren't wii u pictures? and when did the developer say these are pictures of the wii u version?

€dit: and now using your link where is the confirmation for a 60 fps batman? you know that's what people asked you right?

€dit 2: saw you changed the post about trine a little bit and said now that someone else found that out. now my number 3 makes no sense anymore^^