Since your profile states that you are from Yugoslavia, then I'm really hopeful that you understand that nationalism that happened in 90s was VERY much fueled and supported by both Catholic and Orthodox Churches. How many Serbs were killed in name "Bog i Hrvati" and how many Croats in name "Bog čuva Srbe"?

In terms of progress the first route is better.

To make the dilemma even easier to comprehend. What if there is always an answer, which leads to a question? As such the first route would still be the best, but it still leads the human no a never-ending quest for answers, even more trolling that to hit a dead-end where there literally is no answer.

This is deep stuff but I think you can understand what I mean. Though pragmatically you will tell yourself "I will only concern myself with the questions I face", in the big picture, what is your direction if in the end it's a pursuit towards, ultimately, nothing (as you will never find the root)?

EDIT: To reiterate, this is a hypothetical scenario, and there just may be an answer to end the tumbling down the rabbit hole, in which case a weak atheist would be vindicated. But it's a specific hope.

In terms of progress the first route is better.

To make the dilemma even easier to comprehend. What if there is always an answer, which leads to a question? As such the first route would still be the best, but it still leads the human no a never-ending quest for answers, even more trolling that to hit a dead-end where there literally is no answer.

This is deep stuff but I think you can understand what I mean. Though pragmatically you will tell yourself "I will only concern myself with the questions I face", in the big picture, what is your direction if in the end it's a pursuit towards, ultimately, nothing (as you will never find the root)?

EDIT: To reiterate, this is a hypothetical scenario, and there just may be an answer to end the tumbling down the rabbit hole, in which case a weak atheist would be vindicated. But it's a specific hope.

So you are saying that we should accept religious dogmas and stop our pursuit after knowledge?

This is kinda hypocritical to say... Because you are using your PC to post this messages, you use your cell phone on daily basis, you use electricity to power up things, when you are sick you go to physician to get some medicine, you use a car to get there... Everything was made possible by human pursuit after knowledge and understanding. We don't have answers to everything right now, but should we stop because of it? Definitely not. If anything we should work harder. On the bright side at least scientists aren't branded as heretics at burned now.

1.) You realize that natural has multiple definitions. Natural can be a synonym for innate. So yes, someone born with such a disorder would have an innate, or natural, disorder. I advice you to not use ambigious words to prevent confusion.

Glad we agree natural doesn't always mean normal or acceptable

2.) Let's go back to this post this post

You're right, you didn't make that argument. But you did misunderstand Mnementh's post. He was never proving that homosexuality is ok in society. But you seemed to think he was, as evidenced by the bolded. I was correcting you and then I later said why he didn't need to explain why homosexuality is ok in human society - by making the argument that homosexuality is okay in society.

...I thought he was using the animals argument to prove homosexuality is ok in a society. Me, while never disagreeing homosexuality is ok, quoted him saying that's not a real argument to support the claim.

3.)  Also, if everyone remained abstinent, the human race would go extinct, so what? 

Normal is an ambigious word. Be more precise. 

I don't know what do you expect from me here.. homosexuality is not a normal sexuality. You can call it natural, but certainly not normal

Again, what is your point? That hetersexuality is the extremely prevalent sexuality? We all know that

Sorry, I forgot to get this post

If there is always an answer which leads to another question, I still beleive we should keep searching. Because with each question we answer, we become smarter and more knowledgable and we can use that knowledge for good things.

Jay, think bigger picture (bolded above). Apart from technological advancement (which is great), why move forward if there is no end destination. That's basically my question.

If you just move to the next step, you're like an ant. As a human, what's the purpose of moving forward with no end destination in sight?

When you're hiking, and it gets tough, do you tell yourself "oh, it's all good, we'll never get to the end so at least we're going forward". No, rather you say "a few more steps and we're there".

I'm just asking, what is the motivation in a hypothetical case (assuming that's the reality, as it is one of two options really) where there really is no end to the chain of questions.