Soriku said:
Kasz216 said:
I didn't miss the point...
I got the point of it.
the problem was it was a HORRIBLE idea.
That's why the PSP go didn't sell.
It's main concept was flawed.
The differnece between the PSP Go and all the different DS redesigns, was that the DS didn't change functionality, just highlighted certain things over other things.
Which is what the PSP Go should have done. Kept the UMD drive, but greatly expanded the memory. Highlight downloadable games without taking anything away.
The destructoid article was right... how could you argue otherwise when the Go so obviously failed?
Sony didn't know what they were doing with the PSP Go.
Had they kept the UMD drive, the PSP Go would still be selling today.
|
With the UMD drive they wouldn't even have a product. The point of the PSP Go was, like its name says, to have the PSP on the go without holding cases and discs by having download games only. With a UMD drive it would just be a regular PSP so making it would be pointless.
The PSP Go just proves no one wants a download-only gaming system (outside of iOS/Android phones of course, but that's different).
|
Nah, you'd just have a premium PSP option. Just redesign it a bit and throw in an internetal memory. You'd be good to go.
Also the PSP Go could of worked. Just not with the PSP around.
I mean, the advantages of the PSP Go were.... well nearly nonexistent.
I mean... what makes the PSP Go better then a regular PSP with a huge memory stick?