By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Surfer Girl rumors - 16-01-08! (Lots of 'em!!!)

ssj12 said:
kitler53 said:

okay, in response to several threads above me...

...someone posted these facts before but as i can't find the post i'm just going to repose the facts.

from the KH2 website...

© Disney Enterprises, Inc.

Developed by SQUARE ENIX.

© Disney. Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas © Touchstone Pictures. Developed by SQUARE ENIX. Characters from FINAL FANTASY video game series: © 1990, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2005 Square Enix Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. SQUARE ENIX and the SQUARE ENIX logo are trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd..



and even more telling, KH: mobile - SE had no involvement whatsoever and they could do that simply by not including and FF characters. development was by Disney Mobile Studios and Superscape http://www.gamespot.com/mobile/rpg/kingdomhearts/index.html

edit: almost forgot, can't find the link but in the post i referred to above had a link showing that Sora was in fact considered a disney character.

I'm not saying SE doesn't have any say (cause they could say my way or the highway too) but I feel like disney has the upper hand in any negotiations.


I actually doubt Disney would argue due to Square being the better developer. Could you even imagine how bad KH3 would be if Disney's studios made it? omg the quality would drop faster then a lead balloon


 

And why do you think SE is so against KH3 being on the Wii?

It can't a situation where Disney like this?

Disney: We think KH3 should be on the Wii?

SE: Sure, why not? We don't want to sink a lot more money into the PS3 anyway.



Around the Network

I call BS on Turrican for PS3. Factor 5 created Turrican but they don't own the Turrican name. Its was the reason that they were calling the unreleased Turrican sequel Thornado back when they were planning it for Gamecube. So they may be doing Thornado for PS3 but not Turrican unless they somehow gained the rights to the IP.

As for the Wii gaining more raw power, thats BS as well. The Wii could appear to have more processing power when third party developers actually start developing games for the Wii from the ground up.



totalwar23 said:
ssj12 said:
kitler53 said:

okay, in response to several threads above me...

...someone posted these facts before but as i can't find the post i'm just going to repose the facts.

from the KH2 website...

© Disney Enterprises, Inc.

Developed by SQUARE ENIX.

© Disney. Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas © Touchstone Pictures. Developed by SQUARE ENIX. Characters from FINAL FANTASY video game series: © 1990, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2005 Square Enix Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. SQUARE ENIX and the SQUARE ENIX logo are trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd..



and even more telling, KH: mobile - SE had no involvement whatsoever and they could do that simply by not including and FF characters. development was by Disney Mobile Studios and Superscape http://www.gamespot.com/mobile/rpg/kingdomhearts/index.html

edit: almost forgot, can't find the link but in the post i referred to above had a link showing that Sora was in fact considered a disney character.

I'm not saying SE doesn't have any say (cause they could say my way or the highway too) but I feel like disney has the upper hand in any negotiations.


I actually doubt Disney would argue due to Square being the better developer. Could you even imagine how bad KH3 would be if Disney's studios made it? omg the quality would drop faster then a lead balloon


 

And why do you think SE is so against KH3 being on the Wii?

It can't a situation where Disney like this?

Disney: We think KH3 should be on the Wii?

SE: Sure, why not? 


 because the series has been on Sony's consoles and KH pushed the PS2 like FFXII did so they want KH to push the PS3 in a similar way. 



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
ssj12 said:
totalwar23 said:
ssj12 said:
kitler53 said:

okay, in response to several threads above me...

...someone posted these facts before but as i can't find the post i'm just going to repose the facts.

from the KH2 website...

© Disney Enterprises, Inc.

Developed by SQUARE ENIX.

© Disney. Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas © Touchstone Pictures. Developed by SQUARE ENIX. Characters from FINAL FANTASY video game series: © 1990, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2005 Square Enix Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. SQUARE ENIX and the SQUARE ENIX logo are trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd..



and even more telling, KH: mobile - SE had no involvement whatsoever and they could do that simply by not including and FF characters. development was by Disney Mobile Studios and Superscape http://www.gamespot.com/mobile/rpg/kingdomhearts/index.html

edit: almost forgot, can't find the link but in the post i referred to above had a link showing that Sora was in fact considered a disney character.

I'm not saying SE doesn't have any say (cause they could say my way or the highway too) but I feel like disney has the upper hand in any negotiations.


I actually doubt Disney would argue due to Square being the better developer. Could you even imagine how bad KH3 would be if Disney's studios made it? omg the quality would drop faster then a lead balloon


 

And why do you think SE is so against KH3 being on the Wii?

It can't a situation where Disney like this?

Disney: We think KH3 should be on the Wii?

SE: Sure, why not?


because the series has been on Sony's consoles and KH pushed the PS2 like FFXII did so they want KH to push the PS3 in a similar way.

 Really? I guess that's why SE abandoned the PS2 and developed FFX, FFXII for the Xbox, to push hardware capabilities. Yep, that's what they did. And for your comment on SE wanting to develop on the PS3 just because the previous games were on Sony's old platform, I think you should tell Nintendo that.

ssj12 said:
totalwar23 said:
ssj12 said:
kitler53 said:

okay, in response to several threads above me...

...someone posted these facts before but as i can't find the post i'm just going to repose the facts.

from the KH2 website...

© Disney Enterprises, Inc.

Developed by SQUARE ENIX.

© Disney. Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas © Touchstone Pictures. Developed by SQUARE ENIX. Characters from FINAL FANTASY video game series: © 1990, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2005 Square Enix Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. SQUARE ENIX and the SQUARE ENIX logo are trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd..



and even more telling, KH: mobile - SE had no involvement whatsoever and they could do that simply by not including and FF characters. development was by Disney Mobile Studios and Superscape http://www.gamespot.com/mobile/rpg/kingdomhearts/index.html

edit: almost forgot, can't find the link but in the post i referred to above had a link showing that Sora was in fact considered a disney character.

I'm not saying SE doesn't have any say (cause they could say my way or the highway too) but I feel like disney has the upper hand in any negotiations.


I actually doubt Disney would argue due to Square being the better developer. Could you even imagine how bad KH3 would be if Disney's studios made it? omg the quality would drop faster then a lead balloon


 

And why do you think SE is so against KH3 being on the Wii?

It can't a situation where Disney like this?

Disney: We think KH3 should be on the Wii?

SE: Sure, why not?


because the series has been on Sony's consoles and KH pushed the PS2 like FFXII did so they want KH to push the PS3 in a similar way.


Kinda how FFVII was on a Nintendo console?




Around the Network
totalwar23 said:
ssj12 said:
totalwar23 said:
ssj12 said:
kitler53 said:

okay, in response to several threads above me...

...someone posted these facts before but as i can't find the post i'm just going to repose the facts.

from the KH2 website...

© Disney Enterprises, Inc.

Developed by SQUARE ENIX.

© Disney. Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas © Touchstone Pictures. Developed by SQUARE ENIX. Characters from FINAL FANTASY video game series: © 1990, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2005 Square Enix Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. SQUARE ENIX and the SQUARE ENIX logo are trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd..



and even more telling, KH: mobile - SE had no involvement whatsoever and they could do that simply by not including and FF characters. development was by Disney Mobile Studios and Superscape http://www.gamespot.com/mobile/rpg/kingdomhearts/index.html

edit: almost forgot, can't find the link but in the post i referred to above had a link showing that Sora was in fact considered a disney character.

I'm not saying SE doesn't have any say (cause they could say my way or the highway too) but I feel like disney has the upper hand in any negotiations.


I actually doubt Disney would argue due to Square being the better developer. Could you even imagine how bad KH3 would be if Disney's studios made it? omg the quality would drop faster then a lead balloon


 

And why do you think SE is so against KH3 being on the Wii?

It can't a situation where Disney like this?

Disney: We think KH3 should be on the Wii?

SE: Sure, why not?


because the series has been on Sony's consoles and KH pushed the PS2 like FFXII did so they want KH to push the PS3 in a similar way.

 Really? I guess that's why SE abandoned the PS2 and developed FFX, FFXII for the Xbox, to push hardware capabilities. Yep, that's what they did. And for your comment on SE wanting to develop on the PS3 just because the previous games were on Sony's old platform, I think you should tell Nintendo that.

 wtf are you talking about? the only FF game on the Xbox and 360 is FFXI and it's expansion packs. The main FF games will be on the PS consoles while spinoffs like FFXII: Revenant Wings are made on other consoles, Final Fantasy 11 is not a true main series game as its an MMO first made for PC. Kingdom Hearts' is a main console brand and is developed for the PS brand. Logically SE + main series = ps brand unless a deal is made with a company or is a brand new IP like for example Last Remnant which in turn is being made  for both the PS3 and 360.  

Your comment though made you lose all credibility in everything you post. 



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
gamingdevil said:
ssj12 said:
totalwar23 said:
ssj12 said:
kitler53 said:

okay, in response to several threads above me...

...someone posted these facts before but as i can't find the post i'm just going to repose the facts.

from the KH2 website...

© Disney Enterprises, Inc.

Developed by SQUARE ENIX.

© Disney. Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas © Touchstone Pictures. Developed by SQUARE ENIX. Characters from FINAL FANTASY video game series: © 1990, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2005 Square Enix Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. SQUARE ENIX and the SQUARE ENIX logo are trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd..



and even more telling, KH: mobile - SE had no involvement whatsoever and they could do that simply by not including and FF characters. development was by Disney Mobile Studios and Superscape http://www.gamespot.com/mobile/rpg/kingdomhearts/index.html

edit: almost forgot, can't find the link but in the post i referred to above had a link showing that Sora was in fact considered a disney character.

I'm not saying SE doesn't have any say (cause they could say my way or the highway too) but I feel like disney has the upper hand in any negotiations.


I actually doubt Disney would argue due to Square being the better developer. Could you even imagine how bad KH3 would be if Disney's studios made it? omg the quality would drop faster then a lead balloon


 

And why do you think SE is so against KH3 being on the Wii?

It can't a situation where Disney like this?

Disney: We think KH3 should be on the Wii?

SE: Sure, why not?


because the series has been on Sony's consoles and KH pushed the PS2 like FFXII did so they want KH to push the PS3 in a similar way.


Kinda how FFVII was on a Nintendo console?


 The only FF main series games on a Nintendo console is FF1 - FFVI. All was released later on the PS1 and PS2 in anthology (like) collections on a single disc. FFVII, FFVIII, FFIX were ported from the PS2 to PC, due to popularity, but PC doesnt count as it's godlike compared to all consoles. After FF game that were were released after FF9 stopped being ported to PC.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 

Dude you desperately need a sarcasm detector.




Also, that was my point. FFI-FFVI were on Nintendo consoles, still that didn't stop Square from changing to Sony.




gamingdevil said:
Dude you desperately need a sarcasm detector.

 I knew it was sarcasm (both posts) but I felt that explaining the series anyways would help put how Square typically works into people's minds so we dont have sit here arguing about rumors for the next 20 hours. 



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453