ssj12 said:
totalwar23 said:
ssj12 said:
kitler53 said:
okay, in response to several threads above me...
...someone posted these facts before but as i can't find the post i'm just going to repose the facts.
from the KH2 website... © Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Developed by SQUARE ENIX.
© Disney. Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas © Touchstone Pictures. Developed by SQUARE ENIX. Characters from FINAL FANTASY video game series: © 1990, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2005 Square Enix Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. SQUARE ENIX and the SQUARE ENIX logo are trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd..
and even more telling, KH: mobile - SE had no involvement whatsoever and they could do that simply by not including and FF characters. development was by Disney Mobile Studios and Superscape http://www.gamespot.com/mobile/rpg/kingdomhearts/index.html edit: almost forgot, can't find the link but in the post i referred to above had a link showing that Sora was in fact considered a disney character. I'm not saying SE doesn't have any say (cause they could say my way or the highway too) but I feel like disney has the upper hand in any negotiations. |
I actually doubt Disney would argue due to Square being the better developer. Could you even imagine how bad KH3 would be if Disney's studios made it? omg the quality would drop faster then a lead balloon |
And why do you think SE is so against KH3 being on the Wii? It can't a situation where Disney like this? Disney: We think KH3 should be on the Wii? SE: Sure, why not? |
because the series has been on Sony's consoles and KH pushed the PS2 like FFXII did so they want KH to push the PS3 in a similar way. |
Really? I guess that's why SE abandoned the PS2 and developed FFX, FFXII for the Xbox, to push hardware capabilities. Yep, that's what they did. And for your comment on SE wanting to develop on the PS3 just because the previous games were on Sony's old platform, I think you should tell Nintendo that.
