No i meant the sig thing. Stop posting so fast!

I've never heard of WipeOut before, but it seems to be a lot like F Zero. I honestly thought Stefl was referring to the game show when he first mentioned it. lol

Also, those are some very strict rules set by the mod so everyone needs to be careful not to break them. We don't want any modkills this game because of its smaller size. In large games it doesn't matter as much, but it could really hurt us this time. Hopefully we don't have any lurkers this time around either. -_-

Also, due to last round I will not be making any joke votes or joke posts at all. It seems that some people can't take a joke, even if it was the first day.

You seem to be very sure of yourself. Something about this post as well as your initial conversation with Linkz seems to be a bit forced. If you were both scum it would look good to have arguments against each other, but something that early seems too risky imo. For now:

FoS: Spurge
FoS: Linkz

Seriously? Not only did you not read the rules, but you almost lost your abilities for the first night if you have any. I'm not sure what you are trying to do here, but it seems you either didn't read the OP at all, you wanted to see who else was paying attention, or you wanted others to vote for no lynch to make them lose their powers night one. No matter what it was I don't see the benefit from it.

HoS: Prof

so mr crazy, what are your thoughts on what prof did? instead of what he didn't do?

and why do you have you sentenes spaced just a far apart?

Well, I'm here, and I want to implement my plan to help speed the game up by stimulating real discussion even though this game has a hard clock.

I want everybody to put a vote in place. It means people have to make a stand, even if it's not too serious, even if it's No Lynch (well, not this game ), they still have to put it out there. It also means you can't COMPLETELY lurk.

If we didn't have a hard clock, yes we'd be in danger of ending the day prematurely, but that would also give valuable intel, and speed up the usually-horrid Day 1 at an acceptable price IMO.

Vote: to let us No Lynch
but seriously
Vote NotStan

I have a feeling he will turn out to be a lurker. So NotStan, get your ass in here and prove me wrong before you get lynched. Everyone else, lynch him

If you're town, I do hope you read the rules better than you've read my posts.

Still want you to answer how I tried to shut you up.

What are these words doing in my mouth, where did I say I don't want character claims? And how is that distancing myself from radish?

Ha, that wasn't a serious complaint. There's nothing we can do about the spacing of sentences (uness we press shift + enter all the time). 

You mean his almost getting his power taken away? I took it as trolling stefl. He clearly knew the rules:

" Lol stefl
I didnt think you would be so quick to see that." ~ prof

Now, if we actually want to go further with this: 

1) He's a dick
2) He has no power in the first place, so doing something like that won't have too major consequences
3) He does have a power role, so he's stupid for being a dick and trolling stefl 

What else is there to this? 

(Note: not actually calling him a dick )

Final-Fan said: I want everybody to put a vote in place. It means people have to make a stand, even if it's not too serious, even if it's No Lynch (well, not this game ), they still have to put it out there. It also means you can't COMPLETELY lurk.

It seems like you just want the day to end even faster than normal. Any reason in particular? You can see who people are suspicious of without having to vote for that said person.

As for lurkers being mafia. While this is sometimes the case a lot of times it is just people too busy with other things to actually play. Last round the mafia practically forced Stefl to lurk and some of their other members were lurking a bit as well, but it is just guesswork. I agree though, we need to get everyone to participate in this game.

What if I merely illogically know that you're scum?

I am somewhat surprised that only you were punished(prematurely) for discussing a no lynch, rather than whichever team you're on. I guess mafia without a kill would make it obvious you are in fact scum.

I can't say I'm surprised spurge reacted to your hypothetical as if no lynch was an actual option though. Current thinking is he'd be a bit more careful if he was mafia, but that's not necessarily true.

supermario128 said: Final-Fan said: I want everybody to put a vote in place. It means people have to make a stand, even if it's not too serious, even if it's No Lynch (well, not this game ), they still have to put it out there. It also means you can't COMPLETELY lurk. It seems like you just want the day to end even faster than normal. Any reason in particular? You can see who people are suspicious of without having to vote for that said person. As for lurkers being mafia. While this is sometimes the case a lot of times it is just people too busy with other things to actually play. Last round the mafia practically forced Stefl to lurk and some of their other members were lurking a bit as well, but it is just guesswork. I agree though, we need to get everyone to participate in this game.

Well, some people throw so much suspicion around it's worthless, or hard to tell who they are MOST suspicious of.  Lurkers hurt the game and also make it harder to scumhunt.  Why are you trying to make excuses for people?  After at least ten rounds of people joining and then deciding they don't actually feel like following the thread (or posting in it) after all, I don't think it's excusable anymore except in cases of unforseeable events like insomniac (or, if I'm misremembering, whoever had the fire near him).