stof said: But they did give Harvey Birdman a 7. So there's that at least.

7 = Mediocre. Crash Bandicoot: The Wrath of Cortex, Sonic Heroes, Blinx: The Time Sweeper, Banjo Kazooie: Grunty's Revenge, Knights: Journey of Dreams, and Killzone, all got around 70% in GameRankings... And guess what? They all stunk! Well... They were all mediocre... But why play a mediocre game, when you can play a masterpiece? 8/10 = 4/5. Anything less than 4/5 is not worth the money. There are far, too many games, that got 4/5+, to play! Let this be universal... For once! 80%+ = Worth the money! Any less is not! Let this one, simple rule, be universal! Where is the line that divides the bad, from good? Let it, universally, be, to make life easier, at 80%! It makes sense too, because all the good games in Metacritic, and other review sites, seem to be over 80%, and all the bad ones seem to be less than that. Let's compare it to Youtube videos. Everything that has recieved 4/5 stars, or more, is entertaining, yet everything lower is garbage. Correct? Correct! There needs to be a universal law, for numbers, when it comes to rating things! How about this?

i don't know about you but I think SEGA needs to fire some people up top or continue spiral downward...

I would seriously love to be in the brainstorming sessions of Sega. I mean imagine this:

Bill: "Ok I got an idea. We make a racing game."
Sega: "Sounds great Bill, what kind of racing game.
Bill: "Well, we need something to get attention with some name recognition. How about race Sonic?"
Sega: "Sure, and I believe Ted is making a shooting game with Shadow..."

outlawauron said: carlos710 said: outlawauron said: Although third partys are giving Wii some good amount of support ... I don't think this is what most Nintendo fans had in mind. : ) no, we have in mind great games like No More Heroes, which we are also getting. ME too. NMH will be the first third party Wii game I buy. But that was annouced a long time ago wasn't it?

Before the system came out, actually. 

a.l.e.x59 said: Sonic Riders: Zero Gravity, is bringing a friend along to the "Sonic Room of Disgrace." Who is that friend? I believe it's "Sonic RPG!" But ooooooooh, BIOWARE!! Ooooooooh!!! Well... We'll see... We'll see...

So, to cut through the idiocy, what you're basically saying is that a game's central character has a greater affect on the overall quality then the developer? You're almost more annoying than you are ignorant. 

 

Sometimes i just want to spit in the faces of all the losers that are working for SEGA.
Shame on you for ruining the Sonic franchise again.

Schwarz said: Sometimes i just want to spit in the faces of all the losers that are working for SEGA. Shame on you for ruining the Sonic franchise again.

 I totally agree with you, but at least their is that small sonic developer making the sonic rush games, they are still very good, and here's hoping that the sonic rpg turns out good, after they have help from bioware.

^ On this one i agree with you.

well it looks like another sonic game which isnt good

Troll_Monster said: Schwarz said: Sometimes i just want to spit in the faces of all the losers that are working for SEGA. Shame on you for ruining the Sonic franchise again.  I totally agree with you, but at least their is that small sonic developer making the sonic rush games, they are still very good, and here's hoping that the sonic rpg turns out good, after they have help from bioware.

well from now i think that the only good sonic games will be on hand-helds