So, I read this post, and then try to see what exactly the EA developers had said before the interview to confirm if the guy at Gamespot was a moron or not, because what I read from the original article was a beef about the pitch for realism. I then saw I had to spend like 20 minutes, adding to about 5+ minutes of googling for information regarding the game itself, to see what was said. I then realize I have no interest in Warfighter and it isn't even on my radar to get, and i could care less about the guy at Gamespot, or even what Gamespot says. This, combined with looking at a thread about ratings going on like 13 pages about a game I don't care about, complaining that a game liked didn't get a high rating, has me wondering WTF am I spending my time on.
Sorry, I have spent too much time on Warfighter now, so pardon me for not caring to look up the minutia to be right about something I don't care about, and if it disappeared (Warfighter) my life wouldn't be changed in the least. As for ratings, I am seeing why you can't do professional journalism with videogames, because the pay is too little, and too many people complain. The entire business is a promotion racket, where you had bad score inflation. It is entirely useless at this point.
Anyhow, carry on. Warfighter is a 10/10 and the guy at Gamespot is both an moron and a genius. Pick whatever view you want me to say, and consider that to be mine here.