Yes, I did say "that's Turkish" and "didnt expect much better from you" because I've seen your posts everywhere. Never did I deny that or say otherwise.

I'm not even going to bother with your last statement.

Skyrim is not a 'pretty mediocre' game.  Skyrim is an expansive, all-encompassing game that has an above average story and enough content to fill 10 games.  The combat didn't suck, it was simple.  it's an RPG, not an action game, it didn't need to have complicated button presses for combos or dodging, it had attack, defend, magic, etc.  That's jsut how it goes.  I agree that Dark Souls's gameplay was better, but that doesn't mean that skyrims sucked.  

And  yes, they have bugs, but not so much more proportionally to how big the games are...the games are so big that there are more glitches, sure, but the ratio is about the same.  

So, I read this post, and then try to see what exactly the EA developers had said before the interview to confirm if the guy at Gamespot was a moron or not, because what I read from the original article was a beef about the pitch for realism.  I then saw I had to spend like 20 minutes, adding to about 5+ minutes of googling for information regarding the game itself, to see what was said.  I then realize I have no interest in Warfighter and it isn't even on my radar to get, and i could care less about the guy at Gamespot, or even what Gamespot says.  This, combined with looking at a thread about ratings going on like 13 pages about a game I don't care about, complaining that a game liked didn't get a high rating, has me wondering WTF am I spending my time on.

Sorry, I have spent too much time on Warfighter now, so pardon me for not caring to look up the minutia to be right about something I don't care about, and if it disappeared (Warfighter) my life wouldn't be changed in the least.  As for ratings, I am seeing why you can't do professional journalism with videogames, because the pay is too little, and too many people complain.  The entire business is a promotion racket, where you had bad score inflation.  It is entirely useless at this point.  

Anyhow, carry on.  Warfighter is a 10/10 and the guy at Gamespot is both an moron and a genius.  Pick whatever view you want me to say, and consider that to be mine here.

Oh well.

"I only said "that's Turkish" and "didn't expect much better from you" because of what I just said about you in the previous paragraph."

Says otherwise.

Don't bother, its too difficult to express yourself sometimes.

My "previous paragraph" was saying that your posts (those same ones that I read everywhere) are the ones not worth acknowledging and they are the very same posts that I was referring to when I said "that's Turkish" etc. that's why I said "because of what I said about you in the previous paragraph".

I just don't understand why you think that some people refer to me as a ps3 troll. Ive never heard such a thing, maybe you can direct me to specific examples of me being called a ps3 troll? it would also help me report them. Me loving the PS3 is not trolling, me hating on other systems would be trolling.

Trolling is when you post inflamatory comments against something, to get people to go into a feud over it.  When you post excessively positive for something, you fit into the console partisan/fanboy category and what you are doing is shilling.  Shilling can be just as annoying and biased as trolling, but it is a different animal.  So, if you have been posting excessive positive comments connecting to PS3 support, that are biased, you may be guilty of shilling.

Aye. Was Famitsu's scores taken into account for the prestigious metacritic and gamesranking, the latter which decides if Bungie gets its bonus? And how about the proportion of western and eastern reviewers on these sites?

Regardless, I am one of the new-generation nationalistic gamer who is incompetent of making his own opinions on games, so scores determine and justify my purchase.

yep, HE is. there is nothing female about him.