| ClassicGamingWizzz said: they simple want money from the publisher or some shit cause their reviews are lame and garbage. zelda, gravity rush and many other games got trolled by them ... did you guys watch this : http://www.gamespot.com/features/when-did-regenerating-health-become-realistic-6380781/ ( this guy is by far the worst moron they have in the crew ...) then the dev defend the game here : http://e3.gamespot.com/video/6381457/a-matter-of-authenticity |
So, I read this post, and then try to see what exactly the EA developers had said before the interview to confirm if the guy at Gamespot was a moron or not, because what I read from the original article was a beef about the pitch for realism. I then saw I had to spend like 20 minutes, adding to about 5+ minutes of googling for information regarding the game itself, to see what was said. I then realize I have no interest in Warfighter and it isn't even on my radar to get, and i could care less about the guy at Gamespot, or even what Gamespot says. This, combined with looking at a thread about ratings going on like 13 pages about a game I don't care about, complaining that a game liked didn't get a high rating, has me wondering WTF am I spending my time on.
Sorry, I have spent too much time on Warfighter now, so pardon me for not caring to look up the minutia to be right about something I don't care about, and if it disappeared (Warfighter) my life wouldn't be changed in the least. As for ratings, I am seeing why you can't do professional journalism with videogames, because the pay is too little, and too many people complain. The entire business is a promotion racket, where you had bad score inflation. It is entirely useless at this point.
Anyhow, carry on. Warfighter is a 10/10 and the guy at Gamespot is both an moron and a genius. Pick whatever view you want me to say, and consider that to be mine here.
