radishhead said:
Nah, that was the end of the conference |
so sad to read that :/
03/10/09 HUGE day in my life:
What did you think of Microsoft's E3? | |||
Best E3 EVER! | 21 | 3.65% | |
Best MS E3 I've seen in a while | 11 | 1.91% | |
Great! | 30 | 5.21% | |
It was decent | 65 | 11.28% | |
Meh... | 130 | 22.57% | |
Just...no | 115 | 19.97% | |
Worst E3 ever! | 107 | 18.58% | |
See results | 92 | 15.97% | |
Total: | 571 |
radishhead said:
Nah, that was the end of the conference |
so sad to read that :/
03/10/09 HUGE day in my life:
Lostplanet22 said: Xbox MS 2012 conference summary in a vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VejlMi8XB5c |
LMAO!!!!
I DVR'd it I'll watch it later for the laughs
I would give the conference a three out of ten in regards to its entertainment value. You simply shouldn't promote a media event to the general public, and allow that event to become boring, or worse infantile in its presentation. The reality is gamers. The audience being courted have a low tolerance for these antics, and Microsoft isn't doing itself any favors by boring them to tears. Were any movie, television show, or game to do something like this in practice. That product would be publicly ridiculed for good reason.
Speaking to the educational value. Microsoft actually does a worse job. Cross platform connectivity isn't anything close to a new concept, neither is voice recognition for that matter. These design choices are givens. That holds true for browsers as well, and more media partners. Once again it is a given that these things will happen. Basically these things didn't need to be explained, or explained for as long as they were. Microsoft spent forty minutes plus on this content when it should realistically take less then five minutes. If there weren't going to get into specifics. Then it should have been a honorable mention only. The educational value was two out of ten.
I think Microsoft needs to abandon this mixed bag approach, because it is at cross purposes with itself. You can't be lobbying members of the industry and gamers at the same briefing. They are interested in different things, and if in trying to do it for both. You give a poor quality result in regards to both. Then logically you should split them apart so you can make a better presentation to the two groups individually.
The only thing I approved of really was the upfront block, because it shows signs of Microsoft coming around. It wouldn't all be so bad if Microsoft just made the first half of their show about the games, and kept them locked up there. So the general public could tune in for thirty minutes, and then turn off when it came time for the very boring technical showcasing. The only reason any gamer sits through almost a hour of crap is, because they want to see the part of the show that goes out on the high note.
I think this show being better then the previous two outings. Doesn't fundamentally change the fact that it is still crap. Sure you can argue that this show was rabbit shit as compared to the previous cow shit, but should you be at all happy about having shit thrown at you. I for one am not. I am done with their live press events, and will just make it a point to watch the highlights in the future.
Wow so much hate. PS3 gets 7 or 8/10 scores, MS gets below average ratings. I was blown away by Halo, but I'll admit I wish they did something else other then Halo, Gears, Forza, and Fable.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results
Michael-5 said: Wow so much hate. PS3 gets 7 or 8/10 scores, MS gets below average ratings. I was blown away by Halo, but I'll admit I wish they did something else other then Halo, Gears, Forza, and Fable. |
Which is precisely why it got below average ratings. You defended their argument.
In my opinion, Microsoft would be a D or D+, while Sony's would be a C+/B-.
Below Average for MS and slightly above for Sony.
CGI-Quality said:
Oh don't worry, Sony is getting nearly equal amounts of criticism. The conlusion here - these companies can't / won't please everyone, so it's best to sit back, pull out the popcorn, and watch the sparks fly. |
That's true, but I don't think there will be too many sparks. There weren't really that many new first party PS360 titles announced, this generation is ending.
I think most people are really hyped for Nintendo. I'm buying a 3DS if they announce a redesign, and I expect to see at least half a dozen new first party Wii U/3DS titles.
I think Halo 4 looked really cool, same goes for Beyond, Watch Dogs, MGR:R, and TLoU.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results
outlawauron said:
Which is precisely why it got below average ratings. You defended their argument. In my opinion, Microsoft would be a D or D+, while Sony's would be a C+/B-. Below Average for MS and slightly above for Sony. |
Is Sony really any better? They ignored Vita, ripped off Smash Bros, over-emphasized motion gaming and heavily relied on sequels as well.
I think both were terrible, but with a few great highlights (Halo 4, Beyond, and The Last of Us are the only PS360 exclusives I'm hyped for now, but I'll likely pick up Gears & Forza)
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results
CGI-Quality said:
I agree that the gen is nearing its end, and rightfully so. The 360 is heading into its 8th holiday and the PS3 its 7th - time to move on and enjoy brand new experiences on fresh, shiny hardware. |
Yea, I really want them to annoiunce a BC compatible PS4. My PS3 broke like 2 years ago and it's not the same playing on someone elses console. Just want to complete my PS3 collection, and be done with this gen.
Also 7-8 years into the gen....I want something new.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results
Michael-5 said:
Is Sony really any better? They ignored Vita, ripped off Smash Bros, over-emphasized motion gaming and heavily relied on sequels as well. I think both were terrible, but with a few great highlights (Halo 4, Beyond, and The Last of Us are the only PS360 exclusives I'm hyped for now, but I'll likely pick up Gears & Forza) |
sony always better in internet whatever they do
well,internet only
It was extremely dull, underwhelming and rather lame. On the bright side, it met my expectations.
Food for thought: Shove an apple in your brain